In­side/​Out­side View

TagLast edit: 1 Oct 2020 18:25 UTC by Ruby

An Inside View on a topic involves making predictions based on your understanding of the details of the process. An Outside View involves ignoring these details and using an estimate based on a class of roughly similar previous cases (alternatively, this is called reference class forecasting).

For example, someone working on a project may estimate that they can reasonably get 20% of it done per day, so they will get it done in five days (inside view). Or they might consider that all of their previous projects were completed just before the deadline, so since the deadline for this project is in 30 days, that’s when it will get done (outside view). Another term for taking an outside view is reference class forecasting.

The planning example is discussed in The Planning Fallacy. Possible limitations and problems with using the outside view are discussed in The Outside View’s Domain and “Outside View” as Conversation-Halter. Model Combination and Adjustment discusses the implications of there usually existing multiple different outside views.

I did 1500 piece jigsaw puzzle of fireworks, my first jigsaw in at least ten years. Several times I had the strong impression that I had carefully eliminated every possible place a piece could go, or every possible piece that could go in a place. I was very tempted to conclude that many pieces were missing, or that the box had extra pieces from another puzzle. This wasn’t impossible – the puzzle was an open box a relative had done before. And the alternative seemed humiliating.

But I allowed a very different part of my mind, using different considerations, to overrule this judgment; so many extra or missing pieces seemed unlikely. And in the end there was only one missing and no extra pieces. I recall a similar experience when I was learning to program. I would carefully check my program and find no errors, and then when my program wouldn’t run I was tempted to suspect compiler or hardware errors. Of course the problem was almost always my fault.

– Robin Hanson, Beware the Inside View

Further Examples

These illustrate failure to use the Outside View.

Example 1: Japanese students expected to finish their essays an average of 10 days before deadline. The average completion time was actually 1 day before deadline. When asked when they’d completed similar, previous tasks, the average reply was 1 day before deadline. (Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. 2002. Inside the planning fallacy: The causes and consequences of optimistic time predictions. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 250-270. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.)

Example 2: Students instructed to visualize how, where, and when they would perform their Christmas shopping, expected to finish shopping more than a week before Christmas. A control group asked when they expected their Christmas shopping to be finished, expected it to be done 4 days before Christmas. Both groups finished 3 days before Christmas. (Buehler, R., Griffin, D. and Ross, M. 1995. It’s about time: Optimistic predictions in work and love. European Review of Social Psychology, Volume 6, eds. W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.)

It is controversial how far the lesson of these experiments can be extended. Robin Hanson argues that this implies that, in futurism, forecasts should be made by trying to find a reference class of similar cases, rather than by trying to visualize outcomes. Eliezer Yudkowsky responds that this leads to “reference class tennis” wherein people feel that the same event ‘obviously’ belongs to two different reference classes, and that the above experiments were performed in cases where the new example was highly similar to past examples. I.e., this year’s Christmas shopping optimism and last year’s Christmas shopping optimism are much more similar to one another, than the invention of the Internet is to the invention of agriculture. If someone else then feels that the invention of the Internet is more like the category ‘recent communications innovations’ and should be forecast by reference to television instead of agriculture, both sides pleading the outside view has no resolution except “I’m taking my reference class and going home!”

Notable Posts

See Also

Con­fi­dence lev­els in­side and out­side an argument

Scott Alexander16 Dec 2010 3:06 UTC
195 points
190 comments6 min readLW link

Model Com­bi­na­tion and Adjustment

lukeprog17 Jul 2013 20:31 UTC
95 points
41 comments5 min readLW link

Hero Licensing

Eliezer Yudkowsky21 Nov 2017 21:13 UTC
167 points
83 comments52 min readLW link

Mul­ti­tudi­nous out­side views

Davidmanheim18 Aug 2020 6:21 UTC
49 points
13 comments3 min readLW link

What cog­ni­tive bi­ases feel like from the inside

chaosmage3 Jan 2020 14:24 UTC
201 points
25 comments4 min readLW link

Refer­ence class of the unclassreferenceable

taw8 Jan 2010 4:13 UTC
28 points
154 comments1 min readLW link

“Out­side View!” as Con­ver­sa­tion-Halter

Eliezer Yudkowsky24 Feb 2010 5:53 UTC
75 points
103 comments7 min readLW link

The Out­side View’s Domain

Eliezer Yudkowsky21 Jun 2008 3:17 UTC
22 points
14 comments10 min readLW link

Plan­ning Fallacy

Eliezer Yudkowsky17 Sep 2007 7:06 UTC
104 points
45 comments3 min readLW link

The Weak In­side View

Eliezer Yudkowsky18 Nov 2008 18:37 UTC
24 points
22 comments5 min readLW link

The Out­side View isn’t magic

Stuart_Armstrong27 Sep 2017 14:33 UTC
21 points
4 comments6 min readLW link

Cor­rigi­bil­ity as out­side view

TurnTrout8 May 2020 21:56 UTC
36 points
11 comments4 min readLW link

Out­side View(s) and MIRI’s FAI Endgame

Wei_Dai28 Aug 2013 23:27 UTC
21 points
60 comments2 min readLW link

Out­side View as the Main De­bi­as­ing Technique

abramdemski16 Oct 2017 21:53 UTC
6 points
4 comments2 min readLW link

In defense of the out­side view

cousin_it15 Jan 2010 11:01 UTC
18 points
29 comments2 min readLW link

Dis­cus­sion: weight­ing in­side view ver­sus out­side view on ex­tinc­tion events

Ilverin25 Feb 2016 5:18 UTC
5 points
4 comments1 min readLW link

Avoid mis­in­ter­pret­ing your emotions

Kaj_Sotala14 Feb 2012 23:51 UTC
91 points
32 comments7 min readLW link

Toward a New Tech­ni­cal Ex­pla­na­tion of Tech­ni­cal Explanation

abramdemski16 Feb 2018 0:44 UTC
82 points
36 comments18 min readLW link

The Prob­le­matic Third Per­son Perspective

abramdemski5 Oct 2017 20:44 UTC
28 points
3 comments4 min readLW link

Sus­pi­ciously bal­anced evidence

gjm12 Feb 2020 17:04 UTC
48 points
24 comments4 min readLW link

Nav­i­gat­ing dis­agree­ment: How to keep your eye on the ev­i­dence

AnnaSalamon24 Apr 2010 22:47 UTC
47 points
73 comments6 min readLW link

Com­ment on SSC’s Re­view of Inad­e­quate Equilibria

Ben Pace1 Dec 2017 11:46 UTC
12 points
5 comments2 min readLW link

Mis­takes with Con­ser­va­tion of Ex­pected Evidence

abramdemski8 Jun 2019 23:07 UTC
159 points
21 comments12 min readLW link2 nominations1 review

Time­less Modesty?

abramdemski24 Nov 2017 11:12 UTC
16 points
2 comments3 min readLW link

In­duc­tion; or, the rules and eti­quette of refer­ence class tennis

paulfchristiano3 Mar 2013 23:27 UTC
11 points
8 comments9 min readLW link

[Question] What is the right phrase for “the­o­ret­i­cal ev­i­dence”?

adamzerner1 Nov 2020 20:43 UTC
23 points
41 comments2 min readLW link

Gears Level & Policy Level

abramdemski24 Nov 2017 7:17 UTC
41 points
8 comments7 min readLW link

Against Modest Epistemology

Eliezer Yudkowsky14 Nov 2017 20:40 UTC
53 points
49 comments15 min readLW link

Plac­ing Your­self as an In­stance of a Class

abramdemski3 Oct 2017 19:10 UTC
33 points
5 comments3 min readLW link

What Makes My At­tempt Spe­cial?

Andy_McKenzie26 Sep 2010 6:55 UTC
43 points
22 comments2 min readLW link

[Question] What is a rea­son­able out­side view for the fate of so­cial move­ments?

jacobjacob4 Jan 2019 0:21 UTC
33 points
27 comments1 min readLW link

Kah­ne­man’s Plan­ning Anecdote

Eliezer Yudkowsky17 Sep 2007 16:39 UTC
35 points
8 comments2 min readLW link

Trust­ing Ex­pert Consensus

ChrisHallquist16 Oct 2013 20:22 UTC
39 points
81 comments17 min readLW link

How To Be More Con­fi­dent… That You’re Wrong

Wei_Dai22 May 2011 23:30 UTC
37 points
25 comments1 min readLW link

In­stru­men­tal Ra­tion­al­ity 2: Plan­ning 101

lifelonglearner6 Oct 2017 14:23 UTC
15 points
4 comments14 min readLW link

Are You Anosog­nosic?

Eliezer Yudkowsky19 Jul 2009 4:35 UTC
19 points
67 comments1 min readLW link
No comments.