Zvi

• Zvi 25 Jul 2024 14:06 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: Gurkenglas’s comment on: AI #74: GPT-4o Mini Me and Llama 3

  Yeah, I didn’t see the symbol properly, I’ve edited.

AI #74: GPT-4o Mini Me and Llama 3

Llama Llama-3-405B?

Monthly Roundup #20: July 2024

On the CrowdStrike Incident

AI #73: Openly Evil AI

Hous­ing Roundup #9: Restrict­ing Supply

• Zvi 15 Jul 2024 15:30 UTC

  3 points

  0

  in reply to: mishka’s comment on: AI #72: Deny­ing the Future

  So this is essentially a MIRI-style argument from game theory and potential acausal trades and such with potential other or future entities? And that these considerations will be chosen and enforced via some sort of coordination mechanism, since they have obvious short-term competition costs?

AI #72: Deny­ing the Future

Med­i­cal Roundup #3

• Zvi 6 Jul 2024 17:04 UTC

  34 points

  27

  on: 80,000 hours should re­move OpenAI from the Job Board (and similar EA orgs should do similarly)

  Not only do they continue to list such jobs, they do so with no warnings that I can see regarding OpenAI’s behavior, including both its actions involving safety and also towards its own employees.

  Not warning about the specific safety failures and issues is bad enough, and will lead to uninformed decisions on the most important issue of someone’s life.

  Referring a person to work at OpenAI, without warning them about the issues regarding how they treat employees, is so irresponsible towards the person looking for work as to be a missing stair issue.

  I am flaberghasted that this policy has been endorsed on reflection.

AI #71: Farewell to Chevron

Eco­nomics Roundup #2

AI #70: A Beau­tiful Sonnet

Child­hood and Ed­u­ca­tion Roundup #6: Col­lege Edition

Monthly Roundup #19: June 2024

On Claude 3.5 Sonnet

On OpenAI’s Model Spec

AI #69: Nice

• Zvi 19 Jun 2024 10:52 UTC

  4 points

  0

  in reply to: Linch’s comment on: On Deep­Mind’s Fron­tier Safety Framework

  Oh, sorry, will fix.