The Real Rules Have No Exceptions
(This is a comment that has been turned into a post.)
From Chris_Leong’s post, “Making Exceptions to General Rules”:
Suppose you make a general rule, ie. “I won’t eat any cookies”. Then you encounter a situation that legitimately feels exceptional , “These are generally considered the best cookies in the entire state”. This tends to make people torn between two threads of reasoning:
Clearly the optimal strategy is to make an exception this one time and then follow the rule the rest of the time.
If you break the rule this one time, then you risk dismantling the rule and ending up not following it at all.
How can we resolve this? …
This is my answer:
Consider even a single exception to totally undermine any rule. Consequently, only follow rules with no exceptions.[1]. When you do encounter a legitimate exception to a heretofore-exceptionless rule, immediately discard the rule and replace it with a new rule—one which accounts for situations like this one, which, to the old rule, had to be exceptions.
This, of course, requires a meta-rule (or, if you like, a meta-habit):
Prefer simplicity in your rules. Be vigilant that your rules do not grow too complex; make sure you are not relaxing the legitimacy criteria of your exceptions. Periodically audit your rules, inspecting them for complexity; try to formulate simpler versions of complex rules.
So, when you encounter an exception, you neither break the rule once but keep following it thereafter, nor break it once and risk breaking it again. If this is really an exception, then that rule is immediately and automatically nullified, because good rules ought not have exceptions. Time for a new rule.
And if you’re not prepared to discard the rule and formulate a new one, well, then the exception must not be all that compelling; in which case, of course, keep following the existing rule, now and henceforth.
But why do I say that good rules ought not have exceptions? Because rules already don’t have exceptions.
Exceptions are a fiction. They’re a way for us to avoid admitting (sometimes to ourselves, sometimes to others) that the rule as stated, together with the criteria for deciding whether something is a “legitimate” exception, is the actual rule.
The approach I describe above merely consists of making this fact explicit.
- ↩︎
By which I mean “only follow rules to which no legitimate exception will ever be encountered”, not “continue following a rule even if you encounter what seems like a legitimate exception”.
- “If You’re Not a Holy Madman, You’re Not Trying” by 28 Feb 2021 18:56 UTC; 106 points) (
- 2019 Review: Voting Results! by 1 Feb 2021 3:10 UTC; 99 points) (
- My experience with the “rationalist uncanny valley” by 23 Apr 2020 20:27 UTC; 66 points) (
- Instrumental Occam? by 31 Jan 2020 19:27 UTC; 30 points) (
- 16 Mar 2022 18:43 UTC; 25 points) 's comment on Book Launch: The Engines of Cognition by (
- 5 Mar 2023 9:34 UTC; 24 points) 's comment on Selective, Corrective, Structural: Three Ways of Making Social Systems Work by (
- Training Regime Day 22: Murphyjitsu 2 by 26 Apr 2020 20:18 UTC; 13 points) (
- 12 Apr 2020 23:21 UTC; 13 points) 's comment on Seemingly Popular Covid-19 Model is Obvious Nonsense by (
- 31 Jan 2020 20:48 UTC; 6 points) 's comment on High-precision claims may be refuted without being replaced with other high-precision claims by (
- 31 Jan 2020 1:16 UTC; 5 points) 's comment on High-precision claims may be refuted without being replaced with other high-precision claims by (
- 23 Jul 2019 3:39 UTC; 5 points) 's comment on Matt Goldenberg’s Short Form Feed by (
- 22 Jan 2021 19:45 UTC; 4 points) 's comment on Avoid Unnecessarily Political Examples by (
- Is Legal Reasoning Fundamentally Irrational? by 7 Oct 2021 8:22 UTC; 3 points) (
- 27 May 2022 9:00 UTC; 3 points) 's comment on ProjectLawful.com: Eliezer’s latest story, past 1M words by (
- 24 Dec 2023 21:19 UTC; 2 points) 's comment on Pseudonymity and Accusations by (
- 30 Dec 2020 3:33 UTC; 2 points) 's comment on Review Voting Thread by (
This post made me realize some things I was doing wrong in my life, and I sometimes still find myself explicitly saying in my head, “the real rules have no exceptions”, when I’m considering breaking a self-imposed rule. I find it a very useful concept handle.
I endorse this perspective and have since well before this post, and it was great to have it said explicitly and cleanly by someone else. This is especially true because I believe most people disagree with it. I’ve linked back to this a few times.