I think the overall point you’re making is intriguing, and I could see how it might alter my home behaviour if I considered it more deeply. But I also strongly disagree with the following:
Just about every work behavior is an example of bad home behavior
There is a bunch of “work behavior” that has been very useful – in the right measure – for my personal life:
Task Management – This cut down on the time I spend on “life admin”.
Scheduling – Reaching out with “let’s find an evening to play tennis” helps me increase the number of fulfilling activities I do with friends.
Prioritization – Day-to-day life can obscure what’s really important. Thinking about what I really value and want to achieve can make my life more meaningful.
Creating Spreadsheets & Documents – Apart from the obvious use case in personal finance, Spreadsheets are also very valuable to me for evaluating crucial life decisions (“Where should we move?”). I use documents for private events I’m organising (e.g. a weekend trip to the mountains with friends).
Maybe some of them are too obvious and common. But they are things that my grandmother wouldn’t have done – and I suspect that they are mostly derived from work culture.
I recently found a 2-hour interview with Mo Gawdat titled “EMERGENCY EPISODE: Ex-Google Officer Finally Speaks Out On The Dangers Of AI!” from 2 months ago. It has 6.5 million views which is 1 million more views than Sam Altman’s interview on Lex Fridman.
I’ve only skimmed through it, but it seems that Gawdat frames AI developments as an emergency and is mainly concerned about potential misuse.
I likely won’t have time to actually listen to it for a while – but it seems pretty relevant for the AI Safety community to understand what kind of other extremely popular media narratives about dangers from AI exist.