Re­cur­sive Self-Improvement

TagLast edit: 28 Sep 2020 23:29 UTC by Swimmer963

Recursive self-improvement refers to the property of making improvements on one’s own ability of making self-improvements. It is an approach to Artificial General Intelligence that allows a system to make adjustments to its own functionality resulting in improved performance. The system could then feedback on itself with each cycle reaching ever higher levels of intelligence resulting in either a hard or soft AI takeoff.

An agent can self-improve and get a linear succession of improvements, however if it is able to improve its ability of making self-improvements, then each step will yield exponentially more improvements then the next one.

Recursive self-improvement and AI takeoff

Recursively self-improving AI is considered to be the push behind the intelligence explosion. While any sufficiently intelligent AI will be able to improve itself, Seed AIs are specifically designed to use recursive self-improvement as their primary method of gaining intelligence. Architectures that had not been designed with this goal in mind, such as neural networks or large “hand-coded” projects like Cyc, would have a harder time self-improving.

Eliezer Yudkowsky argues that a recursively self-improvement AI seems likely to deliver a hard AI takeoff – a fast, abruptly, local increase in capability—since the exponential increase in intelligence would yield an exponential return in benefits and resources that would feed even more returns in the next step, and so on. In his view a soft takeoff scenario seems unlikely: “it should either flatline or blow up. You would need exactly the right law of diminishing returns to fly through the extremely narrow soft takeoff keyhole.”1.

Yudkowsky argues that there are several points which seem to support the hard takeoff scenario. Some of them are the fact that one improvement seems to lead the way to another, hardware overhang and the fact that sometimes- when navigating through problem space—one can find a succession of extremely easy to solve problems. These are all reasons for suddenly and abruptly increases in capability. On the other hand, Robin Hanson argues that there will be mostly a slow and gradual accumulation of improvements, without a sharp change.

Self-improvement in humans

The human species has made an enormous amount of progress since evolving around fifty thousand years ago. This is because we can pass on knowledge and infrastructure from previous generations. This is a type of self-improvement, but it is not recursive. If we never learned to modify our own brains, then we would eventually reach the point where making new discoveries required more knowledge than could be gained in a human lifetime. All human progress to date has been limited by the hardware we are born with, which is the same hardware Homo sapiens were born with fifty thousand years ago.

“True” recursive self-improvement will come when we discover how to drastically modify or augment our own brains in order to be more intelligent. This would lead us to more quickly being able to discover how to become even more intelligent.

Recursive self-improvement and Instrumental value

Main article: Basic AI drives

Nick Bostrom and Steve Omohundro have separately[2] argued[3] that despite the fact that values and intelligence are independent, any recursively self-improving intelligence would likely possess a common set of instrumental values which are useful for achieving any kind of goal. As a system’s intelligence continued modifying itself towards greater intelligence, it would be likely to adopt more of these behaviors.

Blog posts

See also

External links

Re­cur­sive Self-Improvement

Eliezer Yudkowsky1 Dec 2008 20:49 UTC
26 points
54 comments13 min readLW link

Re­cur­sively Self-Im­prov­ing Hu­man Intelligence

curiousepic17 Feb 2011 21:55 UTC
17 points
13 comments1 min readLW link

...Re­cur­sion, Magic

Eliezer Yudkowsky25 Nov 2008 9:10 UTC
23 points
28 comments5 min readLW link

Cas­cades, Cy­cles, In­sight...

Eliezer Yudkowsky24 Nov 2008 9:33 UTC
24 points
31 comments8 min readLW link

Self-im­prove­ment with­out self-modification

Stuart_Armstrong23 Jul 2015 9:59 UTC
7 points
5 comments1 min readLW link

Stable self-im­prove­ment as a re­search problem

paulfchristiano17 Nov 2014 17:51 UTC
7 points
0 comments7 min readLW link

Ngo and Yud­kowsky on AI ca­pa­bil­ity gains

18 Nov 2021 22:19 UTC
116 points
54 comments39 min readLW link

Virtue ethics and why the ra­tio­nal­ist com­mu­nity might care about it.

David_Gross22 Oct 2020 3:53 UTC
33 points
2 comments6 min readLW link

En­gelbart: In­suffi­ciently Recursive

Eliezer Yudkowsky26 Nov 2008 8:31 UTC
18 points
22 comments7 min readLW link

Con­crete vs Con­tex­tual values

whpearson2 Jun 2009 9:47 UTC
−1 points
32 comments3 min readLW link

[Question] Would you join the So­ciety of the Free & Easy?

David_Gross10 Jul 2019 1:15 UTC
18 points
1 comment3 min readLW link

Notes on notes on virtues

David_Gross30 Dec 2020 17:47 UTC
59 points
5 comments11 min readLW link

Notes on Gratitude

David_Gross13 Jan 2021 20:37 UTC
11 points
0 comments15 min readLW link
No comments.