Already did before reading your comment :D
Throwaway2367
Karma: 254
Deletion restore test
I will delete this comment without trace and another in the regular way. If you see either, please restore it!
Deletion restore test
I will delete this comment in the regular way and another without trace. If you see either, please restore it!
I think you can also delete without a trace, do post authors able to restore that too? (I’d guess no)
(a) 1⁄3 (b) 1⁄3
Reasoning is the same as in the standard case: Probability (when used as a degree of belief) expresses the measure of your entanglement with a given hypothetical world. However, it is interesting that in both cases we know what day it is, making this a particularly evil version: Even after Beauty walks out of the experiment their credence still stays 1⁄3 indefinitely (given it wasn’t heads/even in which case beauty will know everything upon waking up on wednesday)!
+white dot is the eye
(And I’m not sure on the tusks)
Overall, i think the tweet goes into my collection of people reporting ai mistakes which are actually examples of the ai outperforming the human.
I hope I’m not the only one who sees an elephant..
Minor thing: If you already use partial derivatives in the post, I don’t see why you couldn’t have written the one application of lagrange multiplier theorem for the missing part.
The end result is the most elegant formulation of Kelly betting I’ve seen, however, I will keep using my usual formulation for my betting on prediction markets as that one is, in my opinion, better for quick calculation using only my head than this one.
All B (Yes, I know that variants of eliminativism are not popular here, but I was instructed to answer before reading further)
Anthropic should let Claude be used in the EU.
I will give a simple argument:
-
Given that it is already deployed, increasing the region of its legal availability is very unlikely to increase AI risk.
-
The EU also has people who might be able to contribute to AI safety research who will contribute less if the frontier models are not available legally in the EU.
-
Therefore, the action has net benefits.
-
I believe the action’s costs are much less.
-
Anthropic should let Claude be used in the EU.
Unfortunately, I don’t have Claude in my region. Could you ask it why it wrote “*whispers*”, maybe also interrogate it a bit about whether they really believed you (what percent would it assign that they were really speaking without supervision)/if it didn’t believe you why it went along/if it did believe you how does it imagine he was not under supervision?
Ah yes, there is no way situational awareness might emerge in LLMs, just no way at all..
I see, I haven’t yet read that one. But yes, we should be clear what we denote with HH/HT/TT/TH, the coins before, or after the turning of second coin.
Why couldn’t the ball I’ve just got been put into the box on HH? On HH, after we turn the second coin we get HT which is not HH, so a ball is put into the box, no?
I don’t want my name to carry respect. I want individual comments evaluated for their validity.
I like this part of your comment a lot! If you don’t want to periodically create new accounts, another possibility is regularly changing your name to something random.
Which to me strongly suggest Roko was unfamiliar with multiple (imo) strong evidence for the zoonosis origin.
The first part of the third rootclaim debate covers the behavior of the scientists from 53:10 https://youtu.be/6sOcdexHKnk?si=7-WVlgl5rNEyjJvX
The second part of the second rootclaim debate (90 minutes) https://youtu.be/FLnXVflOjMo?si=dPAi1BsZTATxEglP
“No one assigns 70% to this statement.” (Yes, your friend is an idiot, but that can be remedied, if needed, with a slight modification in the statement)