amelia

Corol­lary to the Si­mu­la­tion Hy­poth­e­sis

Does the uni­verse’s recog­ni­tion of mea­sure­ment provide stronger ev­i­dence for be­ing in a simu­la­tion than uni­ver­sal fine-tun­ing?

• ameliaApr 8, 2025, 5:10 AM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Raphael Roche’s comment on: Is the Uni­verse Aware? An Alle­gory in Quan­tum and In­for­ma­tion Physics, with an LLM Twist

• ameliaApr 7, 2025, 2:48 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Richard_Kennaway’s comment on: Is the Uni­verse Aware? An Alle­gory in Quan­tum and In­for­ma­tion Physics, with an LLM Twist

• ameliaApr 7, 2025, 1:14 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Stephen Fowler’s comment on: Is the Uni­verse Aware? An Alle­gory in Quan­tum and In­for­ma­tion Physics, with an LLM Twist

  Thanks for the feedback. I just need a little clarification though.

  You say “The less-incorrect explanation is that observation in the double slit experiment fundamentally entangles the observing system with the observed particle because information is exchanged.”

  So in the analogy, the observing system would be the iPhone? And Hugo/​the universe wouldn’t need to be observing the observer, and differentiating between when it’s being observed and not being observed, in order to cause the information to become entangled in the first place? Is that right?

  I’ll check out the article. Thanks!

• ameliaDec 13, 2024, 7:55 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Raemon’s comment on: Ir­ra­tional Rationalists

• ameliaDec 13, 2024, 7:30 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Raemon’s comment on: Ir­ra­tional Rationalists

• ameliaDec 13, 2024, 4:44 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: winstonBosan’s comment on: Ir­ra­tional Rationalists

• ameliaDec 13, 2024, 4:20 PM

  1 point

  1

  in reply to: James Camacho’s comment on: Wave func­tion col­lapse: Is it re­ally that sur­pris­ing?

• ameliaDec 13, 2024, 4:17 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: James Camacho’s comment on: Wave func­tion col­lapse: Is it re­ally that sur­pris­ing?

• ameliaDec 13, 2024, 3:32 PM

  2 points

  1

  in reply to: Rafael Harth’s comment on: Wave func­tion col­lapse: Is it re­ally that sur­pris­ing?

• ameliaMar 1, 2024, 1:21 AM

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: mouse_mouse’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

• ameliaFeb 29, 2024, 7:29 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: TAG’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

• ameliaFeb 29, 2024, 3:08 AM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: FlorianH’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

  Excellent point, thanks!

• ameliaFeb 28, 2024, 11:16 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: mouse_mouse’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

• ameliaFeb 28, 2024, 9:59 PM

  2 points

  1

  in reply to: kromem’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

• ameliaFeb 28, 2024, 9:37 PM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Richard_Kennaway’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

• ameliaFeb 28, 2024, 3:59 AM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: NicholasKees’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

  Another helpful resource to digest. Many thanks!

• ameliaFeb 28, 2024, 3:53 AM

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: NicholasKees’s comment on: How is Chat-GPT4 Not Con­scious?

  This is very helpful feedback to think about. It appears the paper you referenced will also be extremely helpful, although it will take me some time to digest it on account of its length (74 pages w/​o the bibliography).

  Thanks so much. I appreciate it!

• ameliaOct 24, 2023, 9:44 PM

  2 points

  0

  on: Tax­on­omy of AI-risk counterarguments

  I find this analysis to be extremely useful. Obviously anything can be refined and expanded, but this is such a good foundation. Thank you.