Sable

• Sable 28 Feb 2026 21:06 UTC

  4 points

  0

  in reply to: TristanTrim’s comment on: Whack-a-Mole is Not a Winnable Game

  Thanks!

• Sable 28 Feb 2026 21:06 UTC

  5 points

  0

  in reply to: Petropolitan’s comment on: Whack-a-Mole is Not a Winnable Game

  I’ll admit that this is problematic, but there are rules about what you can and can’t do with land owned by a property tax-exempt entity, I think.

  In my ideal world, of course, nothing would be exempt from the land value tax, not churches or charities or universities. Land use is land use, and the tax is meant to incentivize the best possible use for it; if you can’t afford to pay it, go somewhere else and let the land be redeveloped for a use that can.

  I admit that this is politically impossible and plausibly unconstitutional (taxing churches gets into the separation of church and state; I feel that a simple rule saying that no religion-owned property can be taxed at advantageous or disadvantageous rates compared to the surrounding properties satisfies this, but I understand that many other people feel differently), so I’m not trying to make it happen in real life.

  In real life, if you (say) rented office space for a for-profit company out of a church to get around paying property taxes, I suspect (although don’t know for sure) that that’s tax fraud of some sort, and a crime.

• Sable 28 Feb 2026 21:01 UTC

  4 points

  1

  in reply to: KvmanThinking’s comment on: Whack-a-Mole is Not a Winnable Game

  When I researched this, I found that proving that molecule XYZ get a person high in a specific way in court involves getting expert witnesses to testify. The opposition then brings in their own expert witnesses, at which point a jury of ordinary people have to decide who to believe between disagreeing experts on the topic of psychopharmacology, which isn’t great.

• Sable 28 Feb 2026 20:58 UTC

  4 points

  0

  in reply to: walkingsophie’s comment on: Whack-a-Mole is Not a Winnable Game

  I’m curious: Do you have a strategy in mind to fix the underlying issue?

• Sable 28 Feb 2026 20:57 UTC

  3 points

  0

  in reply to: romeostevensit’s comment on: Whack-a-Mole is Not a Winnable Game

  Very true, although I’m a whole lot less qualified to weigh in there.

  In my experience, resolving underlying issues psychologically takes a large amount of focused work, and most people have neither the ability nor the inclination to do it. Many don’t even want to try, even with the help of a therapist.

Whack-a-Mole is Not a Winnable Game

• Sable 13 Feb 2026 18:39 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: SorenJ’s comment on: Parks Aren’t Nature

  I agree that most people are aware that parks and wilderness are different. That being said, I think most people, when they make appeals to nature, are picturing the park, or something similar. If they’re picturing a real forest, they’re not picturing one where people get eaten by wolves very often.

  I’m contending that natural has only become desirable as humans adapted nature to their desires, so appeals to nature are often not arguments in favor of, as you would put it, true wilderness.

  Conservationism—wanting there to be genuine places where humanity doesn’t go—isn’t a bad thing at all, nor is having many different options along the scale of how “tamed” a “natural” environment is. To each their own. But there’s a motte and bailey used in marketing, where e.g. bottled water is advertised as “natural” water, when actual water in the wilderness can have any number of illnesses or parasites in it. “Natural” is used as an aesthetic, not a reference to actual pre-human wilderness.

  As to whether or not prehistoric life was unrelentingly miserable, well, I’m not sure that’s my claim. Humans hedonically adapt, and if that life is all you’d ever known you’d probably be fine with it. My claim is that it’s absolutely horrifying from a modern perspective, so anyone being nostalgic or sold on how things were better when they were “natural” is mistaken.

• Sable 6 Feb 2026 22:32 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: Dagon’s comment on: Parks Aren’t Nature

  Fair enough!

  I simply see a lot of appeals to nature in everything from advertising to politics, and I’m making the point that the “nature” they’re appealing to is something humans have already greatly adapted for their own comfort and safety.

  I tend to use “creation” personally for referring to everything that exists, as in “everything in creation”.

• Sable 6 Feb 2026 22:28 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: cesspool’s comment on: Parks Aren’t Nature

  I’m gesturing more towards the latter points, yes. Specifically, that the rhetorical device of an appeal to nature is using nature in the aesthetic and Instagrammified sense, not the way the natural world actually is, which is another way that appeals to nature are fallacious.

Parks Aren’t Nature

The Pros and Cons of Be­ing Among Your Tribe

My Ex­pe­rience With EMDR

• Sable 13 Feb 2025 16:59 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: diggs’s comment on: A Per­centage Model of a Person

  I’m really happy to hear that this helped! Remember, all models are wrong, but some are useful. This model is useful for me; use it as long as it is useful to you.

• Sable 13 Feb 2025 16:57 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: Mo Putera’s comment on: The Way Ac­cord­ing To Zvi

  This is awesome! I totally should have thought of it, thanks!

The Way Ac­cord­ing To Zvi

What Ke­tamine Ther­apy Is Like

• Sable 11 Nov 2024 11:02 UTC

  4 points

  1

  in reply to: mu_(negative)’s comment on: What TMS is like

  That’s awesome that you’re doing that research!

  My biggest question is probably what the distribution looks like for people who get TMS for depression—how many of them are “cured” in the sense that they never need TMS again? How many need it again after a year? Two years? And so on.

• Sable 1 Nov 2024 14:38 UTC

  8 points

  3

  in reply to: cubefox’s comment on: What TMS is like

  I do think there’s something to that idea—physical injury and pain is a very universal and visible experience, whereas mental illness is difficult to parse for those who’ve never experienced it. I also think there’s some sense in which ‘treatment’ and ‘cure’ are treated differently for mental and physical illness.

  A doctor wouldn’t just prescribe painkillers for a broken arm and call it a day because your symptoms have been dealt with; they’d want to actually fix the problem. Depression, on the other hand, doctors seem perfectly fine with merely mitigating the symptoms. Perhaps because that’s all they’re confident they can do?

• Sable 1 Nov 2024 14:34 UTC

  3 points

  0

  in reply to: codyz’s comment on: What TMS is like

  I didn’t, but I’m not surprised your sister had that experience. It’s a loud, repetitive noise going off next to your ear. My clinic offered me earplugs, which I didn’t need, but perhaps your sister could have used?

What TMS is like