Hi, I’m the organizer. If you’re in São Paulo or nearby, please show up! We’ll have an introduction to rationality for newcomers, and talk about Systems 1 and 2, Units of Exchange and Goal Factoring.
You can get more details on the Meetup.com event https://www.meetup.com/pt-BR/Racionalidade-em-Sao-Paulo/events/253667078/ or the Facebook event https://www.facebook.com/events/255536928394025/
There’s this http://miegakure.com/ in development for several years now
What do you mean, in this context?
I follow several programming newsletters, and I don’t have context to fully understand and appreciate most links they share (although I usually have a general idea about what they are talking about). It’s still very valuable to me find out about new stuff in the field.
I’d patreon a few dollars for something like this.
Going!
Second one!
Thanks! I’ll look into adding tags and timeframes. I’m not sure how to do that without the layout getting too crowded.
Check the link below, v0.2. Should be working now!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/59redws46ncdiax/predict_v0.2.apk?dl=0
You mean, instead of programming an AI in a real life computer and showing it a “Game of Life” table to optimize, you could build a turing machine inside a Game of Life table, program the AI inside this machine, and let it optimize the table in which it is? Makes sense.
This is weird. I’ll test to see if I can reproduce and report back (hopefully with a fix).
Thanks!
I’m not getting the flickering here… are you on a low-end device? Which version of android are you on?
No difference at all. I just thought it would make sense to phrase the predictions in the form of questions and answers—so you could e.g. pick a question from a pre-made list and just choose your answer.
Good to know, I thought “long press to edit” was a common enough pattern that everybody would discover it.
I’m not sure I get what kind of roulette you mean… something like a ring pie chart?
I thought of using a target, but I’m not sure if that would be much more effective than the sliding bar.
Good point!
A more charitable interpretation is that they are trying to assume less, going a little more meta and explaining the general problem, instead of focusing on specifics that they thing are important, but might not really be.
A failure mode when people don’t try to do this is the user that asks a software developer to “just add a button that allows me to autofill this form”, when maybe there’s an automation that renders the form totally unnecessary.