Dual Pro­cess The­ory (Sys­tem 1 & Sys­tem 2)

TagLast edit: 2 Aug 2020 20:41 UTC by Kaj_Sotala

Dual Process Theory posits two types of processes in the human brain. According to one characterization, Type 2 (also known as System 2) processes are those which require working memory, and Type 1 (also known as System 1) are those which not.

The terms System 1 and System 2 were originally coined by the psychologist Keith Stanovich and then popularized by Daniel Kahneman in his book Thinking, Fast and Slow. Stanovich noted that a number of fields within psychology had been developing various kinds of theories distinguishing between fast/​intuitive on the one hand and slow/​deliberative thinking on the other. Often these fields were not aware of each other. The S1/​S2 model was offered as a general version of these specific theories, highlighting features of the two modes of thought that tended to appear in all the theories.
Since then, academics have continued to discuss the models. Among other developments, Stanovich and other authors have discontinued the use of the System 1/​System 2 terminology as misleading, choosing to instead talk about Type 1 and Type 2 processing. [...] there’s no single “System 1”: rather, a wide variety of different processes and systems are lumped together under this term. It is also unclear whether there is any single System 2, either. [...]
People sometimes refer to Type 1 reasoning as biased, and to Type 2 reasoning as unbiased. But [...] there is nothing that makes one of the two types intrinsically more or less biased than the other. The bias-correction power of Type 2 processing emerges from the fact that if Type 1 operations are known to be erroneous and a rule-based procedure for correcting them exists, a Type 2 operation can be learned which implements that rule.
-- Kaj Sotala, Against “System 1” and “System 2″

Sys­tem 2 as work­ing-mem­ory aug­mented Sys­tem 1 reasoning

Kaj_Sotala25 Sep 2019 8:39 UTC
96 points
19 comments16 min readLW link2 nominations

The Bat and Ball Prob­lem Revisited

drossbucket13 Dec 2018 7:16 UTC
67 points
24 comments15 min readLW link

[Link] Huffing­ton Post ar­ti­cle about dual pro­cess theory

Gleb_Tsipursky6 Jan 2016 1:44 UTC
13 points
2 comments1 min readLW link

Book re­view: My Hid­den Chimp

Bucky4 Mar 2019 9:55 UTC
28 points
0 comments7 min readLW link

Feel­ing Rational

Eliezer Yudkowsky26 Apr 2007 4:48 UTC
178 points
82 comments3 min readLW link

Three ways CFAR has changed my view of rationality

Julia_Galef10 Sep 2013 18:24 UTC
156 points
59 comments5 min readLW link

Willpower De­ple­tion vs Willpower Distraction

Academian15 Jun 2014 18:29 UTC
108 points
25 comments2 min readLW link

The Sub­sti­tu­tion Principle

Kaj_Sotala28 Jan 2012 4:20 UTC
99 points
64 comments4 min readLW link

What’s Your Cog­ni­tive Al­gorithm?

Raemon18 Jun 2020 22:16 UTC
69 points
23 comments13 min readLW link

How You Make Judg­ments: The Elephant and its Rider

lukeprog15 Apr 2011 1:02 UTC
60 points
19 comments13 min readLW link

My ex­pe­rience of the re­cent CFAR workshop

Kaj_Sotala27 Nov 2014 16:17 UTC
45 points
12 comments7 min readLW link

Re­view of Doris, ‘The Mo­ral Psy­chol­ogy Hand­book’ (2010)

lukeprog26 Jun 2011 19:33 UTC
24 points
10 comments5 min readLW link

The Mon­key and the Machine

ProofOfLogic23 Feb 2017 21:38 UTC
17 points
1 comment1 min readLW link

A Tax­on­omy of Bias: The Cog­ni­tive Miser

Kaj_Sotala2 Jul 2010 18:38 UTC
65 points
38 comments5 min readLW link


Zvi23 Jan 2018 0:10 UTC
19 points
7 comments1 min readLW link

[Question] What ex­plana­tory power does Kah­ne­man’s Sys­tem 2 pos­sess?

Richard_Ngo12 Aug 2019 15:23 UTC
31 points
3 comments1 min readLW link

Re­view of Kah­ne­man, ‘Think­ing, Fast and Slow’ (2011)

lukeprog28 Oct 2011 1:59 UTC
40 points
10 comments3 min readLW link

[Link] How to Dispel Your Illu­sions

[deleted]6 Dec 2011 14:46 UTC
37 points
17 comments6 min readLW link

Willpower duality

Gyrodiot20 Jan 2017 9:56 UTC
10 points
8 comments2 min readLW link
No comments.