Behavioural economics has significantly advanced our understanding of human behaviour, shedding light on how it frequently diverges from the traditional economic model predictions of the homo economicus. There is however a growing sense, that the marginal returns of finding and investigating biases have decreased significantly.
There is a renewed interest in adaptive explanations for biases and cognitive biases. This interest is bolstered by progress in at least two different areas: cognitive neuroscience and economic theory. In the former, models assuming that human brains are solving complex Bayesian calculations are now being routinely used. In the latter, richer models studying optimal/equilibrium behaviour in situations where information is incomplete and costly to acquire have enriched economists’ ability to study more realistic decision problems with the economic toolbox.
I recently published a book, “Optimally Irrational”, that discusses the results from behavioural economics with an adaptive perspective that takes from old and recent explanations of human biases as having good reasons. I also started an eponym Substack where I’ll be discussing human behaviour with an adaptive perspective, informed by recent advances in economic theory and cognitive neuroscience. I think these would be of interest to the LessWrong community.
Not another bias!
Link post
Behavioural economics has significantly advanced our understanding of human behaviour, shedding light on how it frequently diverges from the traditional economic model predictions of the homo economicus. There is however a growing sense, that the marginal returns of finding and investigating biases have decreased significantly.
There is a renewed interest in adaptive explanations for biases and cognitive biases. This interest is bolstered by progress in at least two different areas: cognitive neuroscience and economic theory. In the former, models assuming that human brains are solving complex Bayesian calculations are now being routinely used. In the latter, richer models studying optimal/equilibrium behaviour in situations where information is incomplete and costly to acquire have enriched economists’ ability to study more realistic decision problems with the economic toolbox.
I recently published a book, “Optimally Irrational”, that discusses the results from behavioural economics with an adaptive perspective that takes from old and recent explanations of human biases as having good reasons. I also started an eponym Substack where I’ll be discussing human behaviour with an adaptive perspective, informed by recent advances in economic theory and cognitive neuroscience. I think these would be of interest to the LessWrong community.