I don’t know how I would distinguish Inkhaven posts from other posts, so no real option. I think only a very small fraction of people at Inkhaven are posting to LW, so most of the effects are indirect (like Lightcone team members doing their own 1-week writing stints, or writing advisors coming by and writing more posts at the same time). Feel free to make a tag for it, and then you and others can tag them (or you could even make a bot to tag them).
This may be an ugly-toupee issue. Even if most inkhaven-sourced posts on LW are good, it results in a very noticeable increase of low-quality, rushed, or stream-of-consciousness posts.
Huh, do you have links? It’s plausible to me, but I haven’t noticed them. The ones I’ve seen posted seem above average in effort, though not like enormously so?
Inkhaven (and Inkhaven-like) posts are frequently somewhere between ‘low-effort’ and ‘personal blog’ if on LessWrong.
fwiw, I enjoy more of these on LessWrong on the margin. The bar for quality that a post needs to enable marginally more rational thought is not that high, and interacting with lower-effort or more casual posts is psychologically easier, and hence enables me to actually change my mind in practice more often.
I don’t know how I would distinguish Inkhaven posts from other posts, so no real option. I think only a very small fraction of people at Inkhaven are posting to LW, so most of the effects are indirect (like Lightcone team members doing their own 1-week writing stints, or writing advisors coming by and writing more posts at the same time). Feel free to make a tag for it, and then you and others can tag them (or you could even make a bot to tag them).
This may be an ugly-toupee issue. Even if most inkhaven-sourced posts on LW are good, it results in a very noticeable increase of low-quality, rushed, or stream-of-consciousness posts.
Huh, do you have links? It’s plausible to me, but I haven’t noticed them. The ones I’ve seen posted seem above average in effort, though not like enormously so?
I’ll keep an eye out, they’re definitionally not ones I want to retain.
Inkhaven (and Inkhaven-like) posts are frequently somewhere between ‘low-effort’ and ‘personal blog’ if on LessWrong.
fwiw, I enjoy more of these on LessWrong on the margin. The bar for quality that a post needs to enable marginally more rational thought is not that high, and interacting with lower-effort or more casual posts is psychologically easier, and hence enables me to actually change my mind in practice more often.
Created the wikitag: Inkhaven-like posts. How could one rename the tag and/or rewrite the description?
Thanks! I added a link to HalfHaven and re-wrote some of the lines.