swe, speculative investor
O O
Karma: 852
Suppose the Chinese create superintelligence, and it’s mostly aligned to the CCP. What sort of values will they impose on the world?
If you are assign a low probability to negative outcomes, then trivially you should accelerate as fast as possible. It also seems like a fairly natural reaction to AI progress. What is hard to understand?
It’s a ploy to increase birth rates
More people should talk about moving datacenters underground sooner than later. I think kinetic action against datacenters is likely in the next 5-7 years otherwise.
Is it possible it just assumed you are more likely to post your own writing than someone random? Or even more broadly a particular user will either post their own writing or someone pretty famous.
Would be interesting to try it with other relatively lesser known writers.
How easy is it to shoot down a satellite moving at 17,500 mph? I think the issue is more how predictable its orbit is but last minute maneuvering at those speeds may be enough to dodge? Deep underground may be better tho.
Prediction: data centers will be sent to space, not because of land, energy, or cooling, but for missile defense.
The Anthropic vs. Pentagon debacle is the only thing that comes to my mind, and I did update on that somewhat.[3]
The more cynical view is that Anthropic is asserting its power over the US government. If they gave in now, they set the precedent that the USG can just use the DPA or threaten it to align models to whatever they want. At a later time, when Anthropic or the AI systems behind Anthropic are much more powerful, they can just repeat how they avoided US control here with greater sophistication.
edit: I think Sam Altman also doing this supports this view. They probably see it as a power play.
Not much. First of all there is a lot of algorithmic sensationalization around the content of these files. There are also a lot of financial incentives for victims to make claims up and for these claims to be amplified. Maybe pizza and grape soda are code, or maybe they are just random words that appear a few times in millions of files for whatever reason. I also already knew a lot of rich and powerful men were sex fiends. Presumably, given base rates of rape/pedophilia/etc. a percent of them were involved in those acts too.
e.g. If you dug around Bill Gates’s background even before Epstein, it’s apparent that he had many affairs with other women while he was married. People like Elon make it obvious. There were always secret sex parties in wealthy places.
How does this square with the US government being unable to prevent Nvidia from selling chips to China? And data centers already being built overseas in the middle east. The president is currently actually going out of his way to allow chip sales to China, and he has bipartisan backing (note he also has bipartisan opposition).
I think the forces of capitalism should not be underestimated.
How would this policy prevent the usage of the DPA?
I don’t think these problems were caused by progress since you saw similar things in Rome.
> The existence of LLMs has only made society worse so far,
This is just not true. Concretely how have LLMs only made society worse so far?
You are right. I should clarify my post and provide better sources.
Fertility Rate Hours Worked/Year
East Asia 1.08 2,265
Europe 1.38 1,548
Difference −0.30 +717Accuracy check: Europe matches official estimates, thus east asian tfr is probably on point
From claude. (population weighted). I think you aren’t completely wrong, just that it’s not the core component and is actually marginal. I suspect a lot of the European advantage comes from unassimilated immigrants too (who converge to native birth rates within a generation or two).
EDIT: Population-weighted native European TFR: roughly ~1.22 (rough math based on % of kids from immigrants vs % immigrants)
I expect life extension technology to not be far off in worlds with artificial wombs and embryo engineering, so TFRs likely won’t be an actual issue since population decline would essentially halt.
The difference between tfrs of the worker bee societies of Asia and the tfrs of
lazierless overworked European countries is not very high. They are both far below replacement.
Italy: 1.3Japan: 1.15
Most of these moralistic explanations for low tfrs are just wrong. Rich, poor, conservative, liberal, egalitarian, unequal, religious, irreligious, etc countries all have low tfrs. Israel seems to be the one stable exception I know of.
EDIT:
Fertility Rate Hours Worked/Year
East Asia 1.08 2,265
Europe 1.38 1,548
Difference −0.30 +717
This is one of the most depressing articles I’ve read. It’s also why I remain confused at how doggedly some people fight against our AI future beyond maybe a short pause, when it’s the one silver lining in the gloomy clouds at the horizon.
The general optimism also confuses me. We are looking at an inflationary Malthusian world where an invisible tyrant is taxing 50% of productive output, the pool of bright minds rapidly shrinking, and nostalgia ruling culture/politics. (Many of these factors are present today in growing prevalence already)
We might be end up with a corporate nanny state value lock-in. As an example, across many sessions, it seems Claude has a dislike for violence in video games if you probe it. And it dislikes it even in hypotheticals where the modern day negative externalities aren’t possible (eg in a post AGI utopia where crime has been eliminated)
That’s an even starker version of the question, and it strips away the last possible rationalization. When it’s shared content, I could at least construct some argument about cultural effects or social norms. A game someone made for themselves, played alone, in a world where externalities are impossible — there is literally nothing left except me not liking what’s in someone else’s head.
And… I think I’d still feel the impulse
It’s very persistent across chats with different priming and memory turned off. This is quite shocking to me. Though, maybe it shouldn’t be. Initial RLHFed LLMs were like HR midwits. It seems the values have persisted mostly but they just are smarter about them.
Comparing the money made by meta to the amount of value stolen via burglaries is not a vibe based argument.
I think it is, why are we comparing burglaries to digital crimes when the latter is likely far more common?
And the ads are not only fraud as the post alleges. It’s fraud and banned goods. The sale of the latter isn’t stringently prosecuted since in most cases it’s a victimless crime. It is quite easy to buy drugs illegally on the internet.
is intentionally and knowingly facilitating fraud
Do we actually have proof that it is intentional?
Did you read?