ErinFlight

• ErinFlight 19 Apr 2014 23:08 UTC

  23 points

  on: Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014

  Last week, after a lot of thought and help from LessWrong, I finally stopped believing in god and dropped my last remnants of Catholicism. It is turned out to be a huge relief, though coping with some of the consequences and realizations that come with atheism has been a little difficult.

  Do any of you have any tips you noticed about yourself or others after just leaving religion? I’ve noticed a few small habits I need to get rid of, but I am worried I’m missing larger, more important ones.

  Are there any particular posts I should skip ahead and read? I am currently at the beginning of reductionism. Are their any beliefs you’ve noticed ex-catholics holding that they don’t realize are obviously part of their religion? I do not have any one immediately around me I can ask, so I am very grateful for any input. Thank you!

• ErinFlight 31 Mar 2014 1:19 UTC

  21 points

  on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (6th thread, July 2013)

  Hello, I’m Erin. I am currently in high school, so perhaps a little younger than the typical reader.

  I’m fascinated by the thoughts here. This is the first community I’ve found that makes an effort to think about their own opinions, then is self aware enough to look at their own thought processes.

  But, this might not be the place for this, I’m am struggling to understand anything technical on this website. I’ve enjoyed reading the sequences, and they have given me a lot to thing about. Still, I’ve read the introduction to Bayes theorem multiple times, and I simply can’t grasp it. Even starting at the very beginning of the sequences I quickly get lost because there are references to programming and cognitive science which I simply do not understand.

  I recently returned to this site after taking a statistics course, which has helped slightly. But I still feel rather lost.

  Do you have any tips for how you utilized rationality when you were starting? How did you first incorporate it into your thought processes? Can you recommend any background material which might help me to understand the sequences better?

  What links here?

  • Ex­pla­na­tions for Less Wrong ar­ti­cles that you didn’t understand by Kaj_Sotala (31 Mar 2014 11:19 UTC; 28 points)

• ErinFlight 1 Apr 2014 3:13 UTC

  6 points

  in reply to: satt’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (6th thread, July 2013)

  Thank you both! Just starting to go through those explanations, Bayes Theorem is making a lot more sense, and I’m also starting to see why everyone is excited about it.

• ErinFlight 23 Apr 2014 3:06 UTC

  4 points

  in reply to: A1987dM’s comment on: Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014

  (Edited)

• ErinFlight 1 Apr 2014 3:31 UTC

  2 points

  in reply to: Adele_L’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (6th thread, July 2013)

  Thank you for the resources! Kahneman’s book looks very interesting, and luckily my library has it. I’ll check it out as soon as possible. I am planning on taking a Java Programming class next year. Does Java have the same set up/​structure/​foundation as the languages that are referenced on here? What would you say is the programming language that is most relevant to rationality (even if it isn’t a good beginning language)?

• ErinFlight 1 Apr 2014 3:10 UTC

  2 points

  in reply to: Kaj_Sotala’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (6th thread, July 2013)

  Thank you for the link and for starting the thread. The article made me realize that I am going about trying to understand rationality as if I have a major exam in a couple months. Reading many of the articles on here for a second time, I’m grasping them a lot better than I did before. The new thread seems like it will be immensely useful. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer my question!

• ErinFlight 31 Mar 2014 1:06 UTC

  2 points

  0

  on: At­ten­tion con­trol is crit­i­cal for chang­ing/​in­creas­ing/​al­ter­ing motivation

  This seems to be a direct reply to the common thought/​command/​belief “Just stop” As in “why don’t you just stop biting your fingernails/​smoking/​overeating/​procrastinating?” or “Why can’t I just stop (hated activity here)?” I don’t know if this is a common experience, but everyone I have met and discussed the issue with personally (a very small minority) believes that humans have the ability to stop an action by “deciding to stop”. Then, when that fails anger and self-loathing is immediate result. I understand that these thoughts are in no way original, but this is the first time I have seen anything even remotely explaining or offering a solution to the “just stop” in normal areas of life. I had heard of CBT before, but only in regards to extreme depression or self-harm. So, my question. Do you commonly use this process for motivation? Has it proven to be effective in smaller, immediate areas of life?

• ErinFlight 14 Mar 2015 17:24 UTC

  1 point

  on: Has LessWrong Ever Back­fired On You?

  (Edited)

• ErinFlight 23 Apr 2014 3:22 UTC

  1 point

  in reply to: CellBioGuy’s comment on: Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014

  Thank you. Last week was full of “Is this religious? Yes? No? I can’t tell!.” My brain has thankfully returned to normal function, and I will avoid intently analyzing every thought for religious connotations. The lack of guilt is nice, and I don’t want to bring it back by stressing about the opposite.

• ErinFlight 23 Apr 2014 3:16 UTC

  1 point

  in reply to: [deleted]’s comment on: Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014

  The religious allusions seem even blatant now, but there is no way I’m getting rid of my copy of Chronicles of Narnia. I still feel the urge to look in the back of wardrobes.

  Thank you. I had a religious song stuck in my head yesterday, but remembered reading you comment so was able to bypass the feeling of guilt.

• ErinFlight 23 Apr 2014 3:12 UTC

  1 point

  in reply to: B_For_Bandana’s comment on: Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014

  Unlike religion, here no one claims to be all-knowing or infallible. Which, from my point of view at least, is why LessWrong is so effective. Reading the arguments in the comments of the sequences was almost as important as reading the sequences themselves.

  I wouldn’t mind the paradise part or the living forever part though.

• ErinFlight 23 Apr 2014 2:58 UTC

  0 points

  in reply to: Viliam_Bur’s comment on: Open Thread April 16 - April 22, 2014

  Thank you for the advice. I’ve started by rereading the scientific explanations of the big bang, evolution, and basically most general scientific principles. Looking at it without constant justification going on in my mind is quite refreshing.

  So far I’ve been able to avoid most of the arguments, though I was surprised by how genuinely sad some people were. I’m going to keep quiet about religion for a while, and figure out what other pieces of my worldview I need to take a rational, honest look at.

• ErinFlight 1 Apr 2014 3:25 UTC

  0 points

  in reply to: shminux’s comment on: Wel­come to Less Wrong! (6th thread, July 2013)

  Thank you for the link. I’m very pleased to find another source of such interesting ideas. I anticipate the day when I too will read the sequences and be able to say “everything in them seems so obvious.”