The authors notes for 76 imply that the ending was changed, could someone enlighten me to what it was originally?
It was this:
“Hello again, Hermione,” the kindly whisper emanated from the white glow behind the veil. “I’ve been sent to help you, so please don’t be afraid. My name is Myrlirrien, and I am your servant in all things; for you, my Lady, are the last magical descendant of Merlin.”
There were a couple other minor edits throughout the chapter—basically red herrings that Eliezer removed. Draco had jokingly speculated whether Hermione was the Heir of Ravenclaw. Cloak-and-Hat had urged Hermione to flee—to Beauxbatons, or Salem’s Institute, or Durmstrang, or even “the Secret City of Australia”, anywhere but Hogwarts.
Anyone care to speculate about the figure at the end?
Nothing much to speculate I think: The figure at the end was Cloak-And-Hat taking a nicer form after obliviating Hermione, because she incautiously revealed to him the chief reason she hadn’t been trusting him in all the previous iterations of their encounter.
I think if there’s confusion in the readership about this, it’s because not everyone realized that Hat-and-Cloak had this discussion more than once with Hermione, each time changing it somewhat in order to convince her until he frustratedly snapped at Hermione about her not trusting him no matter how many ways he tried to convince her...
Ah I see. I hadn’t realised that was meant to represent her being obliviated and the conversation restarting I thought cloak and hat was revealing a ‘true form’ as the silvery lady.
But Quirrell (1) is not the Potions master and (2) is commonly reckoned to be possessed by Voldemort, who is a Parselmouth even though Q. has told Harry he isn’t. (Of course he would feel no compunction about lying to Harry.)
My point was that there’d be no point in Snape speaking in Parceltongue to Quirrell unless Quirrell could understand it. Your point about Quirrell plausibly having Voldemort’s ability is good.
I don’t know whether there’s any reason they’d have been using Parceltongue.
I believe that you are overthinking this. Look at other writings, that have nothing to do with snakes, and you will find examples such as “‘How dare you speak to me that way!’ she hissed” as a way of speaking when angry. I seriously doubt that it has anything to do with Parseltongue.
No, I meant Quirrell. Could Quirrell understand Parseltongue without being able to speak it?
Dumbledore does not understand “Parseltongue” in MoR and Ron could not have memorized a phrase in it. Parseltongue is not audio structure. Snakes can’t talk.
Despite knowing that snakes can’t actually hear and thus could not possibly have a verbal language, I’ve always thought that Parseltongue must have have some sort of correlation, however rough, between what they were saying and the kinds of hissing they produced.
How else would you use a password-recognition spell—similar to the one for Dumbledore’s office—to lock the Chamber of Secrets?
I was responding to the ‘why would anyone ever use Parseltongue’ comment. It’s interesting that Dumbledore understands Parseltongue, and he is the major person to keep the conversation secret from, but note that Parseltongue would protect against many other factions, and unless the agent had a taperecorder handy or something, it’d also protect against any agent/ally of Dumbledore (if not the man himself), of which there are many.
(I personally don’t think ‘hissing’, for Snape or Quirrel, indicates Parseltongue use—that’s a major secret and would be indicated more strongly.)
Hat-and-Cloak had this discussion more than once with Hermione
I don’t remember that. Which chapter did this take place?
Anyone care to speculate about the figure at the end?
Nothing much to speculate I think: The figure at the end was Cloak-And-Hat taking a nicer form after obliviating Hermione, because she incautiously revealed to him the chief reason she hadn’t been trusting him in all the previous iterations of their encounter.
I assumed that the question referred to the true identity of Mr. Hat-and-Cloak. I do remember that he appeared before in a conversation with Blaise Zabini, and in both that conversation and his recent one with Hermione, it was strongly suggested that he was Professor Quirrell, although I’m very confused about what Quirrell is up to.
It’s not stated outright, but evidence to that effect are
The figure both times says “Hello, again”
both encounters (with Cloak-and-Hat and Shining-Lady) start with “her body jerked around so fast it was like she had Apparated, she found that without any thought or any conscious decision her wand had leaped into her hand and was already pointed at...” (basically she has forgotten turning and forgotten lifting the wand and pointing it)
“Hermione’s heart was already pounding hugely inside her chest, her witch’s robes felt already sweat-dampened against her skin, there was a taste of fear already in her mouth”
“she felt like she needed to grab her right arm just to keep it up, her head ached like she’d been staring at the black mist for days; she didn’t know why she’d gotten tired so quickly.”
At the beginning of the encounter: “she didn’t know why she was so suddenly filled up with adrenaline but her hand gripped harder on her wand. ”
At the end of the encounter “recognition sent a jolt of terrified adrenaline bursting through her”
“Hello again, Hermione,” the kindly whisper emanated from the white glow behind the veil. “I’ve been sent to help you, so please don’t be afraid. My name is Myrlirrien, and I am your servant in all things; for you, my Lady, are the last magical descendant of Merlin.”
Gah, that’s what I read. He took that out? Bah. The new version his trite.
It was this:
There were a couple other minor edits throughout the chapter—basically red herrings that Eliezer removed. Draco had jokingly speculated whether Hermione was the Heir of Ravenclaw. Cloak-and-Hat had urged Hermione to flee—to Beauxbatons, or Salem’s Institute, or Durmstrang, or even “the Secret City of Australia”, anywhere but Hogwarts.
Nothing much to speculate I think: The figure at the end was Cloak-And-Hat taking a nicer form after obliviating Hermione, because she incautiously revealed to him the chief reason she hadn’t been trusting him in all the previous iterations of their encounter.
I think if there’s confusion in the readership about this, it’s because not everyone realized that Hat-and-Cloak had this discussion more than once with Hermione, each time changing it somewhat in order to convince her until he frustratedly snapped at Hermione about her not trusting him no matter how many ways he tried to convince her...
Ah I see. I hadn’t realised that was meant to represent her being obliviated and the conversation restarting I thought cloak and hat was revealing a ‘true form’ as the silvery lady.
One more small issue: “”What?” hissed the Potions Master” is problematic because “What?” lacks s sounds. I don’t think Quirrell knows Parseltongue.
You mean Snape, of course?
No, I meant Quirrell. Could Quirrell understand Parseltongue without being able to speak it?
But Quirrell (1) is not the Potions master and (2) is commonly reckoned to be possessed by Voldemort, who is a Parselmouth even though Q. has told Harry he isn’t. (Of course he would feel no compunction about lying to Harry.)
My point was that there’d be no point in Snape speaking in Parceltongue to Quirrell unless Quirrell could understand it. Your point about Quirrell plausibly having Voldemort’s ability is good.
I don’t know whether there’s any reason they’d have been using Parceltongue.
Now I am imagining a secret language spoken only by postal workers. :)
In general? Security—same reason morphed Quirrel and Harry use Parseltongue. That’s why they are in the forest in the first place.
I believe that you are overthinking this. Look at other writings, that have nothing to do with snakes, and you will find examples such as “‘How dare you speak to me that way!’ she hissed” as a way of speaking when angry. I seriously doubt that it has anything to do with Parseltongue.
Yes, because Dumbledore canonically could.
edit: Here’s the link: Just search for ‘Parseltongue’
Dumbledore does not understand “Parseltongue” in MoR and Ron could not have memorized a phrase in it. Parseltongue is not audio structure. Snakes can’t talk.
Despite knowing that snakes can’t actually hear and thus could not possibly have a verbal language, I’ve always thought that Parseltongue must have have some sort of correlation, however rough, between what they were saying and the kinds of hissing they produced.
How else would you use a password-recognition spell—similar to the one for Dumbledore’s office—to lock the Chamber of Secrets?
I believe that this, right here, is a difference between MoR and canon. (Not that I disagree with it!)
I was responding to the ‘why would anyone ever use Parseltongue’ comment. It’s interesting that Dumbledore understands Parseltongue, and he is the major person to keep the conversation secret from, but note that Parseltongue would protect against many other factions, and unless the agent had a taperecorder handy or something, it’d also protect against any agent/ally of Dumbledore (if not the man himself), of which there are many.
(I personally don’t think ‘hissing’, for Snape or Quirrel, indicates Parseltongue use—that’s a major secret and would be indicated more strongly.)
I wasn’t referring to you specifically, so much as the train of thought extending from:
That definitely seems like overthinking to me, considering how commonly someone hisses in literature.
Though I admit, it would be a great security precaution—which is precisely why Quirrel and Harry do so when the topic is sensitive, as has been said.
I don’t remember that. Which chapter did this take place?
I assumed that the question referred to the true identity of Mr. Hat-and-Cloak. I do remember that he appeared before in a conversation with Blaise Zabini, and in both that conversation and his recent one with Hermione, it was strongly suggested that he was Professor Quirrell, although I’m very confused about what Quirrell is up to.
I’m referring to this latest chapter.
It’s not stated outright, but evidence to that effect are
The figure both times says “Hello, again”
both encounters (with Cloak-and-Hat and Shining-Lady) start with “her body jerked around so fast it was like she had Apparated, she found that without any thought or any conscious decision her wand had leaped into her hand and was already pointed at...” (basically she has forgotten turning and forgotten lifting the wand and pointing it)
“Hermione’s heart was already pounding hugely inside her chest, her witch’s robes felt already sweat-dampened against her skin, there was a taste of fear already in her mouth”
“she felt like she needed to grab her right arm just to keep it up, her head ached like she’d been staring at the black mist for days; she didn’t know why she’d gotten tired so quickly.”
At the beginning of the encounter: “she didn’t know why she was so suddenly filled up with adrenaline but her hand gripped harder on her wand. ” At the end of the encounter “recognition sent a jolt of terrified adrenaline bursting through her”
Gah, that’s what I read. He took that out? Bah. The new version his trite.