Please don’t say this with a straight face any more than you’d blame their acts on “Consequentialism” or “Utilitarianism”. If I thought they had any actual and correct grasp of logical decision theory, technical or intuitive, I’d let you know. “attributed their acts to their personal version of updateless decision theory”, maybe.
maybe it would be more apt to just say they misused timeless decision theory to justify their actions timelessly correct actions may look insane or nonsensical upon cursory inspection, and only upon later inspection are the patterns of activity they have created within the world made manifest for all to see. ^_^
Please don’t say this with a straight face any more than you’d blame their acts on “Consequentialism” or “Utilitarianism”. If I thought they had any actual and correct grasp of logical decision theory, technical or intuitive, I’d let you know. “attributed their acts to their personal version of updateless decision theory”, maybe.
I agree they misused logical decision theories, I’m just stating what they claimed to use.
Also, don’t call things Bayesian when they are only based on informal, non-quantified reasoning.
maybe it would be more apt to just say
they misused timeless decision theory to justify their actionstimelessly correct actions may look insane or nonsensical upon cursory inspection, and only upon later inspection are the patterns of activity they have created within the world made manifest for all to see. ^_^s/misused/misunderstood s/to/and