The 10,000 Year Explosion discusses the effects that civilization has had on human evolution in the last 10,000 years. (There’s also this QA with its authors.) Not sure whether you’d count that as “recent”.
Gregory Clark’s work A Farewell to Alms discusses human micro-evolution taking place within the last few centuries, but is highly controversial (or so I hear).
Yeah, that’s like saying you could domesticate foxes in less than a human generation, or have adult lactose tolerance increase from 0% to 99.x% in some populations in under 4,000 years. Does this guy think we’re completely credulous?
The traits that I am aware of that show strong evolution all have had thousands of years to be selected for, like lactose tolerance in people descended from herders, resistance to high altitude with a hemoglobin change in Tibet, apparent sexual selection for blue eyes in Europeans and thick hair in East Asians, smaller stature in basically all long-term agriculturalist populations...
-Cellbioguy, elsewhere in thread.
I suspect you’ve misidentified his contention here; he clearly doesn’t seem to think humans haven’t evolved within the Holocene.
I don’t remember it doing so, but it’s two years since I read it and I did so practically in one sitting, so I don’t remember much that I wouldn’t have written down in the post.
The infamous Steve Sailer has written a lot about cousin marriage , which, in practice, seems to be correlated with arranged marriage in many cultures (including the European royals in past centuries). Perhaps a lot of arranged marriages in practice may lead to inbreeding, with the genetic dangers that follow.
I’m also wondering about the effects of anonymous sperm banks, where relatively well-off women may pay to choose a biological father on the basis of—whatever available information they may choose to consider. What factors, in a man they will never meet, do they choose for their offspring?
The 10,000 Year Explosion discusses the effects that civilization has had on human evolution in the last 10,000 years. (There’s also this QA with its authors.) Not sure whether you’d count that as “recent”.
Gregory Clark’s work A Farewell to Alms discusses human micro-evolution taking place within the last few centuries, but is highly controversial (or so I hear).
To almost anyone who knows much about evolutionary biology its not controvertial but positively laughable.
Cites?
Yeah, that’s like saying you could domesticate foxes in less than a human generation, or have adult lactose tolerance increase from 0% to 99.x% in some populations in under 4,000 years. Does this guy think we’re completely credulous?
-Cellbioguy, elsewhere in thread.
I suspect you’ve misidentified his contention here; he clearly doesn’t seem to think humans haven’t evolved within the Holocene.
Does it look at possible effects of arranged marriages?
I don’t remember it doing so, but it’s two years since I read it and I did so practically in one sitting, so I don’t remember much that I wouldn’t have written down in the post.
The infamous Steve Sailer has written a lot about cousin marriage , which, in practice, seems to be correlated with arranged marriage in many cultures (including the European royals in past centuries). Perhaps a lot of arranged marriages in practice may lead to inbreeding, with the genetic dangers that follow.
I’m also wondering about the effects of anonymous sperm banks, where relatively well-off women may pay to choose a biological father on the basis of—whatever available information they may choose to consider. What factors, in a man they will never meet, do they choose for their offspring?
Wow. The article was fascinating. I devoured the whole thing. Thanks, Kaj. Do you know of additional information sources on the neurological changes?
Not offhand, but if you get the book, it has a list of references.