rationalists-as-a-group [...] rationalists [...] roughly-canonical among rationalists [...] other rationalists
Who? Am I supposed to have heard of these people? I like what you’re saying about emotions, but tying it to these rushalist people is confusing and makes it more awkward to share this article with people who I think should read it.
If you want a post explaining the same concepts to a different audience, then go write a post explaining the same concepts to a different audience. I am well aware of the tradeoffs I chose here. I wrote the post for a specific purpose, and the tradeoffs chosen were correct for that purpose.
Come on, make your critiques in the straightforward way, and use normal words to express them. I think this being kind of socially focused is a valid critique, but you are coating it in sneering language that feels obnoxious.
Who? Am I supposed to have heard of these people? I like what you’re saying about emotions, but tying it to these rushalist people is confusing and makes it more awkward to share this article with people who I think should read it.
If you want a post explaining the same concepts to a different audience, then go write a post explaining the same concepts to a different audience. I am well aware of the tradeoffs I chose here. I wrote the post for a specific purpose, and the tradeoffs chosen were correct for that purpose.
Come on, make your critiques in the straightforward way, and use normal words to express them. I think this being kind of socially focused is a valid critique, but you are coating it in sneering language that feels obnoxious.