# Disambiguating the ‘Observable Universe’

*I’ve seen a lot of confusion over what precisely the term ‘observable universe’ refers to. This post is an attempt to remedy that. Crossposted from my **personal website**. *

In 1929, Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding. He observed that light emitted from distant celestial objects was redder than expected, due to the downward shift in frequency as their light receded from Earth. And the further away the objects were, the proportionately greater their redshift. Since objects were getting further apart from each other, figures like Lemaître and Friedmann reasoned that there must have been some point in the past at which the whole universe was compressed into a single point.

Embarrassingly, linear extrapolation implied an age of the universe of 1-2 billion years, shorter than the known age of the oldest rocks on Earth. One of the difficulties is that expansion flipped from slowing down to speeding up after several billion years, and this requires complex observations of supernovae to account for. In any case, astronomers eventually measured the age of the universe at about 13.8 billion years. This implies three tempting definitions for the observable universe — that part of the whole universe which we can theoretically see — only one of which is correct.

**Universe age in light-years: **You would be forgiven for thinking that the observable universe is a sphere with a radius of 13.8 billion light-years centred on the Earth, since that’s how long light has had to reach us. However, this assumes the universe isn’t expanding or contracting.

**The Hubble radius:** Hubble found that the distance to a given galaxy was proportional to its recessional velocity, with a constant of proportionality now called the Hubble constant *H*. This implies there is a sphere past which everything is travelling away from us faster than the speed of light. This is known as the Hubble sphere, and it has a radius of around 14.4 billion light-years.

You may worry that this faster-than-light travel violates Einstein’s theory of relativity, which says that nothing can travel faster than light. However, what relativity says is that matter within space can’t travel faster than light, but nothing about how fast space itself can travel.

The Hubble sphere isn’t the observable universe either. The radius of the Hubble sphere will be given by c/H, where *c* is the speed of light. And the Hubble constant is decreasing: the relative velocities of celestial objects are (on average) growing more slowly than the distances between them. Therefore the Hubble sphere is expanding. If the Hubble sphere expands fast enough, light leaving an extremely distant object can get ‘caught’ and drop from the faster-than-light region outside the sphere to the slower-than-light region inside. Once this light is within the Hubble sphere, it can make its way to Earth (this is explained well in this video). If you work out their present distance from us, it turns out that all of the photons we receive from the first five billion years of the universe’s existence were all caught by the Hubble sphere. These objects were, are, and always will be travelling away from us faster than the speed of light!

**The particle horizon:** The full extent of the observable universe is bounded by the particle horizon, which is the region from which light has had time to reach us since the beginning of the universe, taking into account its expansion. The particle horizon has a radius of 46.5 billion light-years, so the observable universe is 93 billion light-years across.

The famous cosmic microwave background is at the particle horizon, and its light has taken 13.8 billion years to reach us (the fact that it consists of microwaves is an extreme version of redshifting). In the jargon, the *proper *distance (the actual distance not taking into account the expansion of the universe) is 46.5 billion light-years but the *comoving *distance (taking account of expansion) is 13.8 billion years.

The particle horizon limits how far in distance we can observe, while the Hubble sphere limits how far back in *time* we can observe. We could never see objects outside the Hubble sphere as they are now, no matter how long we waited. Moreover, just as light can get caught in the Hubble sphere, the expansion of space can push light out of it. Every second, 20,000 stars become newly unobservable from Earth. In a few billion years, the observable universe will consist of only our Local Group of a few dozen galaxies. Future astronomers would gaze upon a barren universe.

*Thanks to Gytis Daujotas for reading a draft of this post*.

Another good resource on this, which distinguishes the

affectableuniverse, theobservableuniverse, theeventually observableuniverse, and theultimately observableuniverse: The Edges of Our Universe by Toby Ord.I’m embarrassed to admit I don’t quite get what comoving vs proper distance is. Can you explain?

I think this explanation is good: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comoving_and_proper_distances#Uses_of_the_proper_distance

Comoving means the reference frame follows the particle itself (as opposed to us, the source, etc). Space is expanding behind the photon in addition to in front of it and it has to travel a long time to reach us. This makes us get different answers if we ask “how far is it between the object that emitted this photon and us today (proper distance)” vs asking “how long/far has the photon traveled(comoving distance)”. For photons the comoving distance (ly) is identical to time of flight (yr).

I belive astronomy’s use of “comoving” is slightly different from the special relativity meaning and astronomers ignore the time dialation and length contraction effects. So the frame follows the particle for the purposes of expansion but is still in our/the observers frame as far as time, length, velocity etc.

Nice to see some astronomy/cosmology post here. I quickly added the tag astronomy.

Minor nitpick:

It

appearsto be expanding. While the consensus is that it does expand, there are quite a few unexplained details and alternative hypotheses about that.