I don’t care if it can sustain huge amounts, actually. It shouldn’t have this even if it’s sustainable.
If you’re now saying the truth or falsity of the core assertion that your entire argument relied on has no bearing on your actual policy preferences, I’ll take that as a win.
I’m a little confused, what do you think is the core assertion that my argument relied on?
I don’t care if it can sustain huge amounts, actually. It shouldn’t have this even if it’s sustainable.
If you’re now saying the truth or falsity of the core assertion that your entire argument relied on has no bearing on your actual policy preferences, I’ll take that as a win.
I’m a little confused, what do you think is the core assertion that my argument relied on?