Murder is about intent. I think Dario believes that his actions reduce the chance of human extinction due to AI because Anthropic is doing a better job then competitors.
When it comes to Sam Altman, I don’t think he believes that OpenAI is likely going to kill humanity.
Facebook on the other hand, is intentionally and knowingly facilitating fraud because they think that the government is unlikely to punish them for it and try to make as much money as they think they can get away with without the government punishing them.
If you argue that the likely fine you have to pay is lower then the profit you are making and thus you don’t need to engage in strong measures to reduce fraud, I do see that as sign of intent.
When Meta shows it’s users an ad that it believes to with 90% probability from a scammer, it should at least tell the user about the ad likely being a scam. Withholding that information when especially older users probably thinks that Meta goes through some effort about not just presenting the user with scams seems clearly intentional as it would be easy to show the user a warning that Meta thinks that the ad is more likely than not a scam.
Murder is about intent. I think Dario believes that his actions reduce the chance of human extinction due to AI because Anthropic is doing a better job then competitors.
When it comes to Sam Altman, I don’t think he believes that OpenAI is likely going to kill humanity.
Facebook on the other hand, is intentionally and knowingly facilitating fraud because they think that the government is unlikely to punish them for it and try to make as much money as they think they can get away with without the government punishing them.
Do we actually have proof that it is intentional?
If you argue that the likely fine you have to pay is lower then the profit you are making and thus you don’t need to engage in strong measures to reduce fraud, I do see that as sign of intent.
When Meta shows it’s users an ad that it believes to with 90% probability from a scammer, it should at least tell the user about the ad likely being a scam. Withholding that information when especially older users probably thinks that Meta goes through some effort about not just presenting the user with scams seems clearly intentional as it would be easy to show the user a warning that Meta thinks that the ad is more likely than not a scam.