If you argue that the likely fine you have to pay is lower then the profit you are making and thus you don’t need to engage in strong measures to reduce fraud, I do see that as sign of intent.
When Meta shows it’s users an ad that it believes to with 90% probability from a scammer, it should at least tell the user about the ad likely being a scam. Withholding that information when especially older users probably thinks that Meta goes through some effort about not just presenting the user with scams seems clearly intentional as it would be easy to show the user a warning that Meta thinks that the ad is more likely than not a scam.
If you argue that the likely fine you have to pay is lower then the profit you are making and thus you don’t need to engage in strong measures to reduce fraud, I do see that as sign of intent.
When Meta shows it’s users an ad that it believes to with 90% probability from a scammer, it should at least tell the user about the ad likely being a scam. Withholding that information when especially older users probably thinks that Meta goes through some effort about not just presenting the user with scams seems clearly intentional as it would be easy to show the user a warning that Meta thinks that the ad is more likely than not a scam.