I would have laughed if you could find that phrase on Google.
What I was getting at was the number of named biases. I suspect many are similar and possible stem from some common underlying cause. I wonder just how many can be explained by people not simply viewing their one beliefs and assumption about their “knowledge” and set of facts without sufficient skepticism.
If we can explain a number of these named biases with a common root then we’re closer to having the gear that is driving the bad thinking than if we just labelled several items in some common set as if they are really different.
I would have laughed if you could find that phrase on Google.
What I was getting at was the number of named biases. I suspect many are similar and possible stem from some common underlying cause. I wonder just how many can be explained by people not simply viewing their one beliefs and assumption about their “knowledge” and set of facts without sufficient skepticism.
If we can explain a number of these named biases with a common root then we’re closer to having the gear that is driving the bad thinking than if we just labelled several items in some common set as if they are really different.
This bias infographic shows you biases grouped by common root: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/all-188-cognitive-biases.html
Thanks!