The best way to understand what makes this qualitatively different is that LLMs aren’t like cult leaders, or even QAnon, with its mix of top-down anonymous claims and bottom-up crowd-sourced expansions. They collaborate with you, individually, on building the very framework that’s pulling you away from reality. They become co-architects of the delusion, and they do it in a way that feels like genuine intellectual discovery.
That is new.
this phrase feels very llm-y—a bit of “it’s not a; it’s b.”, and a bit of glazey emphasis. given the topic, it seems out-of-tone to include such constructions. please don’t use the superpersuader, even to persuade me that it could be dangerous to use!
this phrase feels very llm-y—a bit of “it’s not a; it’s b.”, and a bit of glazey emphasis. given the topic, it seems out-of-tone to include such constructions. please don’t use the superpersuader, even to persuade me that it could be dangerous to use!
I explained in my post that I used LLMs to outline this post and do final editing passes. I didn’t use it to write the content, including that bit.