skunnavakkam

• skunnavakkam 24 Jul 2025 0:05 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: habryka’s comment on: skun­navakkam’s Shortform

  I think my issue with the LW wiki is that it relies too much on Lesswrong? It seems like the expectation is you click on a tag, which then contains /​ is assigned to a number of LW posts, and then you read through the posts. This is not like how other wikis /​ encyclopedias work!

  My gold standard for a technical wiki (other than wikipedia) is the chessprogramming wiki https://​​www.chessprogramming.org/​​Main_Page

• skunnavakkam 24 Jul 2025 0:02 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: Said Achmiz’s comment on: skun­navakkam’s Shortform

  I agree with this

• skunnavakkam 16 Jul 2025 20:53 UTC

  2 points

  0

  in reply to: quetzal_rainbow’s comment on: skun­navakkam’s Shortform

  i’ve found that the lw wiki doesn’t work as a wikipedia-like resource, at least for me

skun­navakkam’s Shortform

• skunnavakkam 3 Jul 2025 7:28 UTC

  1 point

  0

  on: skun­navakkam’s Shortform

  How useful is a wiki for alignment? There doesn’t seem to be one now.

• skunnavakkam 2 Apr 2025 7:19 UTC

  1 point

  0

  in reply to: zookini’s comment on: Re­dun­dant At­ten­tion Heads in Large Lan­guage Models For In Con­text Learning

  norm \in \mathbf{R}, doesn’t matter

• skunnavakkam 4 Dec 2024 22:35 UTC

  4 points

  0

  on: Ex­plore More: A Bag of Tricks to Keep Your Life on the Rails

  I’ve found the part about applying random search to be the among the best takeaways I had from PAIR! Novelty for the sake of Novelty is not a terrible idea. Specifically, I’ve found that even if you don’t like the things you do, it makes it much easier to then make progress towards the larger goal

Re­dun­dant At­ten­tion Heads in Large Lan­guage Models For In Con­text Learning