skunnavakkam

Karma: 10

ai safety; physics

skunnavakkam 24 Jul 2025 0:05 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: habryka’s comment on: skunnavakkam’s Shortform
I think my issue with the LW wiki is that it relies too much on Lesswrong? It seems like the expectation is you click on a tag, which then contains / is assigned to a number of LW posts, and then you read through the posts. This is not like how other wikis / encyclopedias work!

My gold standard for a technical wiki (other than wikipedia) is the chessprogramming wiki https://www.chessprogramming.org/Main_Page

skunnavakkam 24 Jul 2025 0:02 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: Said Achmiz’s comment on: skunnavakkam’s Shortform
I agree with this

skunnavakkam 16 Jul 2025 20:53 UTC
2 points
0
in reply to: quetzal_rainbow’s comment on: skunnavakkam’s Shortform
i’ve found that the lw wiki doesn’t work as a wikipedia-like resource, at least for me

skunnavakkam 3 Jul 2025 7:28 UTC
1 point
0
on: skunnavakkam’s Shortform
How useful is a wiki for alignment? There doesn’t seem to be one now.

skunnavakkam 2 Apr 2025 7:19 UTC
1 point
0
in reply to: zookini’s comment on: Redundant Attention Heads in Large Language Models For In Context Learning
norm \in \mathbf{R}, doesn’t matter

skunnavakkam 4 Dec 2024 22:35 UTC
4 points
0
on: Explore More: A Bag of Tricks to Keep Your Life on the Rails
I’ve found the part about applying random search to be the among the best takeaways I had from PAIR! Novelty for the sake of Novelty is not a terrible idea. Specifically, I’ve found that even if you don’t like the things you do, it makes it much easier to then make progress towards the larger goal