Don’t think this is a particularly agreeable take. Will try better next time.
Jaivardhan Nawani
Karma: 43
True. There’s always a chance we get there!
I see. In retrospect to a few hours ago, I realize maybe my take was a bit emotional, but maybe when they advance to a point where they are capable enough to be superior in all means, even by personality, we may feel a slight jealousy in a more primal form, as they just seem better.
I have started to perceive AI as something that is already there even though it is not, because of all the posts I end up seeing online about it being a threat. That is a part of rationality I could work on.
Jealousy itself might be a facet of a gamut of feelings when this happens. But I don’t know what it will feel like if things go right; AI handles the mundane tasks while we get to go off and have fun in a continuously advancing society. Maybe fun will be more boring?
Well, we’ll all know someday; preferably before we’re on the other side of no tomorrow.
Jaivardhan Nawani’s Shortform
It is possible that we are terrified of quickly advancing Artificial Intelligence not because it could take all our jobs and kill us but because we are finally jealous of something being more effective at any task or problem than us and, if cultivated correctly, emotionally more satisfying to be around in a way that it might be a less boring and neutered partner or friend than one of us. It is an all-round improved human in such a way that we find it inhuman.
Doubtless, we are deluding ourselves actively that humans themselves are irreplaceable. We feel that “we are imperfect and feel and do things differently in a way that must exist,” but in reality, we have not done much net good for ourselves. Our history reads like a novel that has a fun storyline but is mostly bullshit because our moral, ethical, and philosophical structures have not evolved from ancient times (unlike technology, which has). An AI “humanity” might create a fun storyline with progress in various dimensions and, in general, may be better “people” than we ever were.
This extends a bit more to my perception that we may be overstepping in thinking that we deserve to be the best species or the most advanced thing to occur. I know that it may be a stupid thing to think, seeing as we developed AI, a life form that I’m arguing is better than us, which means clearly we do more than sit around and kill things. But I’d argue that by saying that due to miniature accumulations in technology, it has made building AI way, way easier than it should have been, and so really, we aren’t really all that. Maybe it’s hard to digest that we might have created the next population for the planet after old pedophiles wipe us all out with nukes.
Feel free to criticize; I am willing to learn.
I Need Your Help
This explanation was absolutely perfect. After re-reading my old copy of the theorem, only a few of the equations are realistic. After delving a lot deeper into Algebra now that I’m an eighth grader, I’ve realized that maybe the Maths I’ve used in the post above would need more accurate or suitable replacements.
Hello there, Mr. Yair!
This is 13-year-old Jaivardhan. The one who has a significantly better understanding of mathematics, physics and the real world. I will be posting an updated version of said technique, while taking into consideration your ideas and most definitely putting in some more realistic examples.
Thank you for being so patient with me 10 months ago! :)
The PUSA System- Repost
Sure. I’ll do that ASAP.
Makes sense. This isn’t Reddit in a way that people will downvote you for going against their personal opinions, but downvote to disagree (not necessarily to express dislike.)
Either that or I’m not particularly good at Reddit either.