For extreme ASI, I don’t have much hopes of Chinese labs solving alignment—they don’t appear to even try. So in this scenario we’d be cooked either way.
For mild controllable ASI, I agree with you that the world’s liberal democracies might now be better off with China. I think it depends on the next US administration and whether it commits to the policy of “USA as a coercive global empire” or go back to a more cooperative international stance.
Yes, definitely the WingDings. I got hit by the safety filters too, several times, until I asked Haiku to give me a text file of the story with all WingDings translated to normal font. Providing that text file to Opus worked without issues and we managed to have a good discussion about it.
I like the idea, though I also already really like classical options such as footnotes, and don’t even mind footnotes on footnotes.
One UI feedback point: when expanding an item, it is currently shown exactly like the main text. I’d have preferred some form of highlighting, maybe slightly different font colours or background colour for each level, to show where the expansion starts and ends. I found when expanding an item, I wanted to read the addition but couldn’t quickly identify where it ended, which made it more difficult for my brain to selectively read just the expanded part.
I’d view interpretability as a necessary evil that can make omnicidal futures less likely while building capable AI without any robust solutions to the alignment problem. (To be clear, my preferred solution would be not building highly capable AIs before we find solutions for alignment.)
If society was somehow hell-bent on creating one (or a few) billion-fold clonable superperson(s), with unproven technology that may end up with very alien motivational systems, I’d also suggest mind-reading on those before we hand over the world to them. I think it’s much less important to read minds of ordinary humans, which are less capable, singular and have vaguely human-shaped values—thus the trade-off looks worse there.