FWIW I used this same basic conceit this month to create H.D. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” as a social media feed.
David Gross
Karma: 2,216
I also notice that all of your examples are modeled by thin, young men. Some examples that are suitable for less-thin, less-young men might broaden the appeal of your advice.
A year or two ago I went on a vacation that took me to Italy, and I felt very underdressed in my what-fits-in-a-carryon clothes. What I noticed when I was there was that somehow the Italian men just knew how to wear clothes well.
I’m not someone who is very interested in fashion or who spends much mental energy on what I or other people are wearing (where I live, a frumpy middle-aged guy like me can beat the curve just by remembering to change out of his jammies), but I stopped what I was doing and watched passers-by as though it were a fashion show. I was impressed and interested and wanted to learn. I didn’t see much that was particularly flashy (though sometimes unexpected and bold color combinations) or that shouted out “expensive designer accessories and $150 shirts.”
FWIW, they almost all wore skinny-leg pants.
Mr. Hume has entered the chat. ;-)
Did you feel or see brightness or lights even while your eyes were closed (I’m assuming they were)? That is a common sign of piti.
It was mostly a visceral/tactile experience, but there was something subtle accompanying it visually, along the lines of hypnagogic imagery or synesthesia or visualization/imagination. The visual part wasn’t dramatic or central to the experience.
As far as what sort of visceral it was… I usually see piti described as tingly, sparky, that sort of thing. What I experienced was much more liquid: more like sloshing around in a bath of sensation than being peppered by fireworks.
It also wasn’t very “insightful” the way I had been primed to expect. I think I was supposed to interpret what was happening as being obviously indicative of the ceaseless arising and passing away of all phenomena or some such, but to me it seemed to be mostly a curious altered state of consciousness of no great relevance to my day-to-day understanding of how the world operates or how I ought to interpret my sense experience. More of a “woah, that was trippy” than an “aha, I get it now” sort of experience. It was not emotionally tinged except in the sense that I get a certain charge out of the curious and novel, and this was strikingly more curious and novel than the Goenka nostril-gazing I’d been engaged in for the previous several days.
I did a Goenka retreat that featured a few days of extended sits using a body-scan technique that is more or less as you describe here. On a couple of occasions I experienced a strange altered state of consciousness in which my body boundaries seemed to dissolve and waves of sensation washed over me from all directions. It was curious, but I would not describe it as “rapture” or “bliss” or any of that. It seemed to match something the instructors there were calling bhanga ñana (ñana is perhaps just “jhana” in another dialect?).
I’m wondering why you think I could have engaged in so many hours of body-scan-style meditation, sufficient to evoke such an altered state of consciousness, and yet I never came across these particularly-pleasurable or positive-emotion-charged states that you mention?
Perhaps the Goenka focus on “equanimity” blunts these? Another option might be more mundane hypnotic suggestion: the Goenka instructors primed us for a particular altered state of consciousness, so that is what appeared; if they’d primed us for bliss and rapture we may have interpreted our experiences as blissful and rapturous.
emojis
UML
certain ubiquitous GUI conventions (☰ for a menu, > and ˅ for collapsable sections, the “home” icon, the “save” icon, escalating vertical bars for signal strength, %-complete bars, etc.)
Things that have more “incentive-y” vibes are those that are more associated with selfishness and vices like greed. Money: incentive!! Admiration of your peers: incentive???
Another word for “incentive” that can be used in this context is “temptation.” It can be revealing to reread economistspeak policy recommendations after applying a mental search-and-replace along these lines.
LESSWRONG GUILTIED TO A ZEGNATRONIC ROCKET SOCIETY
SF Bay Area types may enjoy the reference. If you don’t get it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Chu
Stanley Milgram wasn’t pessimistic enough about human nature?
I think most people find abnormal or weird (like my tendency for them to affect me physically)
I was under the impression that emotions affecting people physically is considered very normal and ordinary: anger making the blood rush to your head, fear making you quake or your hair stand on end, shame making you blush, etc. All of those things I consider to be part of the standard vocabulary of emotions such that if I describe someone as <having stereotypical physical reaction> to <associated emotion> I assume the person I’m describing it to will get it most of the time. Indeed, it’s hard for me to distinguish an “emotion” from, say, an “assessment” without there being something akin to physical symptoms going on.
FWIW, I asked Claude for its opinion today. It thought that new communication media/dynamics (A7, B14, B15 along with B8 & B9) were likely to blame, and that survivorship bias (A12) probably also plays a role.
Claude also suggested I add “The collapse of shared epistemic authorities” as another hypothesis, similar to but distinct from B15: “It’s not just that gatekeepers died; it’s that there’s no longer any institution or process that a broad majority accepts as capable of settling factual questions. When people disagree about facts, there’s no court of appeal. This makes all disagreement look like stupidity from the other side’s perspective, because there’s no shared standard by which to adjudicate it.”
Listing the virtues from Claude’s “Constitution”
Some of what you’re after might be found under the headings of endurance, good temper, balance, patience, forbearance, and gracefulness.
The meat-eater problem...
...probably should be defined somewhere in this text, or a link should be provided to a glossary definition.
I’d recommend putting some effort into strengthening the virtues, as these have a good track record over time, are flexible across many situations, and have application in multiple areas of life. Specific skills (like e.g. “learn to code”) are more brittle in times of rapid change and less broadly-applicable. The virtues are also remarkably neglected in our society at the moment, which means that by developing them in yourself you can differentiate yourself from the crowd. They are also a way to be more self-sufficient in governing your life satisfaction: less dependent on unstable and stormy societal structures and unreliable external goods.
“How are you coping with the end of the world?” journalists sometimes ask me… The journalist is imagining a story that is about me, and about whether or not I am going insane...
Seems too cynical. I can imagine myself as a journalist asking you that question not because I’m hoping to write a throw-away cliche of an article, but because if I take seriously what you’re saying about AGI risk, you’re on the cutting edge of coping with that, and the rest of us will have to cope with that eventually, and we might have an easier time of it if we can learn from your path.
This would be more powerful with some examples, e.g. “we’ve all learned that Lamarck thought species evolved by passing on acquired traits, but Darwin told us that species can’t evolve that way but do so through selection on preinherited traits; but here’s a quote from Origin of Species in which Darwin explicitly endorses Lamarckian evolution.” Repeat for Kuhn, Kant, etc.
This inevitably involves getting rid of detritus that no longer serves you, but that’s only in service of pursuing your ideal life
If you enjoyed my “Philosophers Wrestling with Evil as a Social Media Feed” post, I used this same basic conceit this month to create H.D. Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience as a social media feed.
It presents the text of Civil Disobedience in a feed-like format, interspersed with comments from various people who have praised and critiqued the work over the years, or have used it as a launching point for their own ideas; as well as from Thoreau himself in his later works, elaborating on some of the same ideas. From time to time WikiBot and BibleBot chime in to explain references to possibly obscure things and references.