Caspar Oesterheld(Caspar Oesterheld)

Stop-gra­di­ents lead to fixed point predictions

Proper scor­ing rules don’t guaran­tee pre­dict­ing fixed points

Ex­tract­ing Money from Causal De­ci­sion Theorists

Mo­ral re­al­ism and AI alignment

The law of effect, ran­dom­iza­tion and New­comb’s problem

Nat­u­ral­ized in­duc­tion – a challenge for ev­i­den­tial and causal de­ci­sion theory

A sur­vey of polls on New­comb’s problem

In­vi­ta­tion to com­ment on a draft on mul­ti­verse-wide co­op­er­a­tion via al­ter­na­tives to causal de­ci­sion the­ory (FDT/​UDT/​EDT/​...)

Are causal de­ci­sion the­o­rists try­ing to out­smart con­di­tional prob­a­bil­ities?

Publi­ca­tion on for­mal­iz­ing prefer­ence util­i­tar­i­anism in phys­i­cal world models

Two-box­ing, smok­ing and chew­ing gum in Med­i­cal New­comb problems

Re­quest for feed­back on a pa­per about (ma­chine) ethics