This is for SquirrelInHell. rot13 to avoid spoilers.
The series is a rational fiction because Lex Luthor’s reaction to Superman’s activities is the same as yours. He says, “this is impossible based on known physics” then “given that information, what the hell is actually going on?”. The story proceeds from that overall scientific perspective onward.
How did this end up going? Any chance of us getting an update?
I have several recommendations.
First things first, I strongly recommend reading this blog post by Siderea on the possible values of attending University. The difference between a public and private high school for you may very well be similar to the difference between a lower and higher status university. This article will expand your list of possible benefits and detriments to the two (and more) options. Spending lots of time around higher status and higher income people has a lot of benefits that aren’t immediately obvious. (I’m assuming the private school is higher status here. I don’t know your area and there are certainly low status private schools out there.)
I recommend adding these ideas to your considerations, reading what ScottL describes below, and then doing Goal Factoring on the entire question. Goal Factoring is a very useful CFAR technique that works well in this exact type of situation. I don’t see a great write-up for it online and I’m not sure how great that link is at describing it. However, if you’d like to hear a more thorough explanation and practice the technique after you’ve looked into this stuff you’re welcome to PM me your skype username and we can chat about it sometime soon. (I’m decent at debugging, but if you get any other offers you should definitely take those up as well as or instead of mine.)
And I also recommend going and meeting some people who actually attend the public high school or just taking a day off and wandering into the place to see what it’s actually like in person. You may be slightly dissatisfied at your current location but would absolutely hate the public high school. (Bullying isn’t a myth, the grass is always greener on the other side, etc.) The year you’re in will also have a lot of consequences in what your experience is like since many friendships are already formed and group boundaries defined by the end of the 2nd year (if not the 1st).
Last but not least, if you don’t already have a clear answer and want a hundred other things to consider (or you’ve decided on an answer and are ready for your next challenge) you should take a look at the Starting University Advice Repository thread. One of the primary values of High School is preparing you for and enabling your progression in University. This includes socially (for relationships), academically (for knowledge), building study habits, developing your writing, developing interpersonal skills, acquiring culture (acculturating), making use of the high school’s prestige, and more (as described in Siderea’s post linked above).
Does that include the grade inflation at major universities or the universities with specific classes that have their difficultly increased and grading deflated so that they fail out students at a more regular rate? (I know some universities do the second type on the introductory science courses while others do it at 3rd year courses.) Or were you referring to something else like bribes?
In terms of virtue ethics: you are the kind of person we want here. And if someone doesn’t, then that’s a personality failing on their part.
Please stick around.
AlphaGo will be playing against a top Korean player, Lee Se-dol, in March. Lee is a 9 dan player (highest tier) whereas Fan Hui was only a 2 dan. AlphaGo beat Fan 5-0 so it’s hard to tell how good of a player it is in comparison. I’m very interested in seeing the results of the next match.
Note: There seems to be some misreporting on the rank of Lee Se-dol on some American news sites. He’s definitely a top Korean and world player, but I don’t think he’s #1 right now. Someone else is welcome to correct me on this.
Very impressive article by Sidrea on the real reasons and value behind universityhttp://siderea.livejournal.com/1261773.html?format=light
I think that even making guesses about someone’s identity on an anonymous account is in very poor taste and actively discourages participation by people who are attempting to use anonymity as a tool to, “share [their] mind authentically”. I consider that sort of thing doxing similar to doxing because it takes actions on identity outside of the anonymous person’s terms. These days I’m generally against anything that has the potential to decrease activity on LW. (And even if Clarity is a generally ridiculous poster, he does foster discussions on the site at the very least.)
I think it’s far from ideal, but that doxing things similar to doxing are at least 100x worse as a community norm.
I think there is very high value in sincerity, that both of the qualities you’ve described are heavily attached to sincerity, and that the effective and regular signaling of sincerity is going to be pretty much impossible to maintain without actually being sincere. If you really want to be effective in these areas, you might try to become easygoing and less selfish rather than trying to figure out how to fake those things.
For both if true and if not true: do you think posting this publicly is productive or a good idea when Clarity just said he didn’t want to cross pollinate?