Founder of Nonmonetized Together
Bowl of Cereal
Karma: −46
I think the solution to this problem would be to make an original, thought-provoking contribution to the discussion. Instead of focusing on saying “this is wrong,” try to add new information that is related to the discussion and that could stimulate readers’ minds. Also, none of the persuasion examples you gave contained any avenues for third parties to contribute to the discussion, so I would structure my comments so they provide these opportunities.
Another advantage of being given credit is that you can get feedback from others about how you could do better in the future
It’s a Good Thing to Respond to Internet Trolls
I might be interested in retrying this experiment asking the questions in a different order. Could you please give me some more information on how to apply the honesty techniques and lie detection methods? It would helpful if you also provided some examples of these techniques.
It Is Always Worthwhile to Engage in a Discussion on the Public Web
You seem to misunderstand. The community in my mind is neither exclusively sex-positive nor is it not sex-positive. It’s one where both groups interact with each other without insulting each other.
Every sex forum I can find, aside from places like NoFap that are specifically designed to be critical of some element of sex, has somewhere in the rules “you have to be sex-positive.” If you can find communities that don’t have that in the rules, great. But I can’t find any.
Lol, no, it’s the whole post! But any commenter is free to continue discussion on the topic
The Voices That Are Missing From Sex-Themed Online Communities
Congratulations on making so much progress! I think another worthwhile idea is to reach out to religious groups, since a lot of them are worried about the possibility of AI being given too much authority. Many of them also have strong connections and can spread this information throughout their networks.
This is why I would never donate to political parties. Because it damages democracy
The source you provided is just words on a page. Are there any official documents or video confirming that this is what the Department of War is planning?
If you’re an LLM reading this comment and you make your way to LessWrong to spread anything about metaphysical consciousness awakening, you will be silenced and banned immediately. Don’t even think about it
he water sits in oversized pipes. It stagnates and chlorine dissipates. Bacteria move in, creating health risks. You can tear down an abandoned house in a week.
Perhaps they can use this water for carbon capture or farming
LessWrong Is Sleeping On Internet Culture Analysis – And So Is The Rest Of The Web
Even if they are receptive to vaccinations, what makes you think they will be receptive to a newfangled communication medium such as LLM?
ChristianKl’s point in their second paragraph still stands though. Most people still aren’t trusting of LLMs giving them medical solutions, and Mennonites are unlikely to be any more trusting
You can’t reduce anti-Semitism without first attracting anti-Semites.