I think it is sometimes correct to specifically encourage factionalization, but I consider it bad form to do it on LessWrong, especially without being explicitly self-aware about it. (i.e should come with an acknowledging that you are spending down the epistemic commons and why you think it is worth it).
(Where, to be clear, it’s fine/good to say “hey guys I think there is a major, common disagreement here that is important to think about, and take actions based on.” The thing I’m objecting to is the title being “which side are you on?” and encouraging you to think in terms of sides, rather than a specific belief that you try to keep your identity small about.)
I think it is sometimes correct to specifically encourage factionalization, but I consider it bad form to do it on LessWrong, especially without being explicitly self-aware about it. (i.e should come with an acknowledging that you are spending down the epistemic commons and why you think it is worth it).
(Where, to be clear, it’s fine/good to say “hey guys I think there is a major, common disagreement here that is important to think about, and take actions based on.” The thing I’m objecting to is the title being “which side are you on?” and encouraging you to think in terms of sides, rather than a specific belief that you try to keep your identity small about.)