The missed opportunity to be able to vote on the post itself this new way stands out—so I’ll put it here: 🎉!
2.
The old voting problem is still present: Roughly, the longer the comment (or post), the more likely the same person has different views of parts.
3.
The (modular) anonymity aspect (and the dichotomy aspect) limit some combinations as being clearly from the same person.
Seeks Truth/​Seeks Conflict
Combine both and you can get something. Seeks Cruxes? (Currently blocked by exclusive restriction.)
Skeptical + Enthusiastic*
Not quite the same as ‘important if true’. Maybe: ‘if this works out it could help progress (think cruxes)‘, or ‘I’m not sure that’ll work, but if it does it’ll be amazing.’
Also could be Experiment/​experiment related. (In that there’s a sense it could go both ways.)
(Currently blocked by exclusive restriction.)
*I read these as being intended as opposites, though they weren’t set to be exclusive. Empathy/​Surprise, less so, but still a little bit.
Hits the mark + Misses the point:
You hit the dead center...of a different target.
I could see these being tricky, in that, people arguing about what the point is, happens. Also sometimes a really unusual definition is employed, but not given, and that throws off everyone discussing the implications. (Not that this happens a lot, but I saw it happen recently. Another case of ‘important stuff in the comments, that the post should be edited to reflect, if only via a ‘Edit: by _ I meant _.’ added to the end of the post.)
1. Experiments
The missed opportunity to be able to vote on the post itself this new way stands out—so I’ll put it here: 🎉!
2.
The old voting problem is still present: Roughly, the longer the comment (or post), the more likely the same person has different views of parts.
3.
The (modular) anonymity aspect (and the dichotomy aspect) limit some combinations as being clearly from the same person.
Seeks Truth/​Seeks Conflict
Combine both and you can get something. Seeks Cruxes? (Currently blocked by exclusive restriction.)
Skeptical + Enthusiastic*
Not quite the same as ‘important if true’. Maybe: ‘if this works out it could help progress (think cruxes)‘, or ‘I’m not sure that’ll work, but if it does it’ll be amazing.’
Also could be Experiment/​experiment related. (In that there’s a sense it could go both ways.)
(Currently blocked by exclusive restriction.)
*I read these as being intended as opposites, though they weren’t set to be exclusive. Empathy/​Surprise, less so, but still a little bit.
Hits the mark + Misses the point:
You hit the dead center...of a different target.
I could see these being tricky, in that, people arguing about what the point is, happens. Also sometimes a really unusual definition is employed, but not given, and that throws off everyone discussing the implications. (Not that this happens a lot, but I saw it happen recently. Another case of ‘important stuff in the comments, that the post should be edited to reflect, if only via a ‘Edit: by _ I meant _.’ added to the end of the post.)