Only if it is susceptible to mathematical description.
What isn’t?
Physicalism doesn’t imply that you get extra knowledge by personally instantiating something.
Then either “what it’s like to see red” is not knowledge, like how to ride a bicycle, or this kind of physicalism can’t explains bicycles and you should use better one.
What isn’t?
Then either “what it’s like to see red” is not knowledge, like how to ride a bicycle, or this kind of physicalism can’t explains bicycles and you should use better one.
Qualia.
It isn’t. There is no reason it should be know-how