Issues like these motivated the development, at MIT in the 1960s, of a “Dateless Decision Theory”, intended to provide a rigorous answer to questions like, If I’m single, should I do something about it, or just get on with serving the greater good? But the UN banned it after the publication of studies alleging that the accumulation of DDT in the intellectual food chain had a net negative effect on human reproductive fitness.
So … that’s what happened to Love and Life Just Before the Singularity. It never made sense to me to remove something that innocuous from the public web, but it all fits if that was the work of a global conspiracy!
This is extremely troubling news. With a shadowy world government agency clamping down on serious argument about no-mating strategies, one has to wonder how much the public discourse has been skewed by them. And would it be a good idea to attempt to replicate any of the suppressed research? There is a tricky tradeoff here between figuring out the truth about this critical question, and not rising to the attention of the suppressing agency.
Effective Altruists, you have a new purpose! Spend your money on increasing your reproductive fitness and impregnating/getting-impregnated!
I’m sure some important considerations would be the genetic interaction between altruistic traits—whether they are actually indeed inherited, as well as the heritability of effectiveness associated traits.
I think EAhub or some other established platform would be a good platform to signal EA cred and avoid creepers taking advantage of it. That way people can’t just say “I’m an EA, wanna fuck?”
“Beware, demon!” he intoned hollowly. “I am not without defenses.” “Oh yeah? Name three.” -- Robert Asprin, Another Fine Myth
Name 3 EA charities you’ve donated to!
Or maybe, it would motivate creepers to do good! Sucks for us singles who prefer pseudoanonymity on LW/EA-forums though.
Issues like these motivated the development, at MIT in the 1960s, of a “Dateless Decision Theory”, intended to provide a rigorous answer to questions like, If I’m single, should I do something about it, or just get on with serving the greater good? But the UN banned it after the publication of studies alleging that the accumulation of DDT in the intellectual food chain had a net negative effect on human reproductive fitness.
So … that’s what happened to Love and Life Just Before the Singularity. It never made sense to me to remove something that innocuous from the public web, but it all fits if that was the work of a global conspiracy!
This is extremely troubling news. With a shadowy world government agency clamping down on serious argument about no-mating strategies, one has to wonder how much the public discourse has been skewed by them. And would it be a good idea to attempt to replicate any of the suppressed research? There is a tricky tradeoff here between figuring out the truth about this critical question, and not rising to the attention of the suppressing agency.
Effective Altruists, you have a new purpose! Spend your money on increasing your reproductive fitness and impregnating/getting-impregnated!
I’m sure some important considerations would be the genetic interaction between altruistic traits—whether they are actually indeed inherited, as well as the heritability of effectiveness associated traits.
Also, ability to cooperate to solve problems and manage their family in evidence based ways would be important considerations.
I think EAhub or some other established platform would be a good platform to signal EA cred and avoid creepers taking advantage of it. That way people can’t just say “I’m an EA, wanna fuck?”
Name 3 EA charities you’ve donated to!
Or maybe, it would motivate creepers to do good! Sucks for us singles who prefer pseudoanonymity on LW/EA-forums though.