Fortunately, there’s a good (and well-known) alternative, which is to randomize decisions sometimes, at random. You tell people: “I will roll a 20-sided die. If it comes up 1-19, everyone gets their money back and I do what I want. If it comes up 20, the bets activate and I decide what to do using a coinflip.”
Nice! My argument is that markets already do that to some extent, because people and organizations can behave randomly / not according to the markets, which creates a distinction between different policies that can be conditioned on
I mentioned this solution in my first post discussing this issue (as well as all subsequent posts):
Nice! My argument is that markets already do that to some extent, because people and organizations can behave randomly / not according to the markets, which creates a distinction between different policies that can be conditioned on