I don’t think nuclear power is currently a cost-effective approach to mitigating global warming. It only really makes sense when geopolitical concerns are a factor, eg threats to tankers transporting LNG to Europe or Japan.
Elaborate? Assuming there were no political blockers, why is it not cost effective? Is it because the energy output of a plant is limited by how far the energy can travel, and therefore you’d need many plants?
I don’t think nuclear power is currently a cost-effective approach to mitigating global warming. It only really makes sense when geopolitical concerns are a factor, eg threats to tankers transporting LNG to Europe or Japan.
Elaborate? Assuming there were no political blockers, why is it not cost effective? Is it because the energy output of a plant is limited by how far the energy can travel, and therefore you’d need many plants?