Rather, I would say it’s been defined quite well in a way that makes sense to people in that scene, but not translated to a definition that makes sense for rationalists.
It’s a step from “having nothing on LW at all about this” and allows for further clarification. I commend Chris for creating something to build off of.
Rather, I would say it’s been defined quite well in a way that makes sense to people in that scene, but not translated to a definition that makes sense for rationalists.
What use is that?
It’s a step from “having nothing on LW at all about this” and allows for further clarification. I commend Chris for creating something to build off of.