I think that’s a really bad way of thinking about it. It’s not like you play 100 hours and 50 hours go into attention to trademarks 10 go into learning math etc.
Every hour that you play does multiple things at the same time.
It depends on what the alternative is. If the alternative is doing nothing or sitting in front of the TV then surely anything learned from a game is better.
But here the alternative is to prefer games or in general interactions that have less attention diversion.
For children that means playing and talking with them. Directing their attention to lasting topics.
The effect of media and marketing on children is addressed in multiple parenting guide. A scientific inquiry into this can be found here:
Discussing what is better wasn’t my point. The point is that it’s a bad idea to separate out hours as being about A or B. I don’t think that’s a useful way of thinking about an activity that does multiple things at the same time.
I think that’s a really bad way of thinking about it. It’s not like you play 100 hours and 50 hours go into attention to trademarks 10 go into learning math etc.
Every hour that you play does multiple things at the same time.
It depends on what the alternative is. If the alternative is doing nothing or sitting in front of the TV then surely anything learned from a game is better. But here the alternative is to prefer games or in general interactions that have less attention diversion. For children that means playing and talking with them. Directing their attention to lasting topics.
The effect of media and marketing on children is addressed in multiple parenting guide. A scientific inquiry into this can be found here:
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199791231/obo-9780199791231-0006.xml
Discussing what is better wasn’t my point. The point is that it’s a bad idea to separate out hours as being about A or B. I don’t think that’s a useful way of thinking about an activity that does multiple things at the same time.