What? Nothing is in conflict you just took quotes out of context. The full sentence where Zvi commits is:
So unless circumstances change substantially – either Yann changes his views substantially, or Yann’s actions become far more important – I commit to not covering him further.
To me responding further does not necesarily imply a change in position or importance, so I still think the sentences are somewhat contradictory in hypothetical futures where Yann responds but does not substantially change his position or become more important.
I think the resolution is that Zvi will update only this conversation with further responses, but will not cover other conversations (unless one of the mentioned conditions is met).
What? Nothing is in conflict you just took quotes out of context. The full sentence where Zvi commits is:
To me responding further does not necesarily imply a change in position or importance, so I still think the sentences are somewhat contradictory in hypothetical futures where Yann responds but does not substantially change his position or become more important.
I think the resolution is that Zvi will update only this conversation with further responses, but will not cover other conversations (unless one of the mentioned conditions is met).
If he does comment further, it’s likely to be more of the same.