Some other ideas for the list of the “rationality realism”:
Probability actually exists, and there is a correct theory of it.
Humans have values.
Rationality could be presented as a short set of simple rules.
Occam razor implies that simplest explanation is the correct one.
Intelligence could be measured by a single scalar—IQ.
correspondence theory is the correct theory of truth.
correspondence-truth is established by a combination of predictive accuracy and simplicity.
every AI has a utility function..
.. even if its utility function is in the eye if the beholder
modal realism is false..
.. but many worlds is true.
.. You shouldnt care about things that make no observable predictions..
.. unless it’s many worlds.
You are a piece of machinery with no free will...
...but its vitally important to exert yourself to steer the world to a future without AI apocalypse.
These ideas are definitely pointing in the direction of rationality realism. I think most of them are related to items on my list, although I’ve tried to phrase them in less ambiguous ways.
Some other ideas for the list of the “rationality realism”:
Probability actually exists, and there is a correct theory of it.
Humans have values.
Rationality could be presented as a short set of simple rules.
Occam razor implies that simplest explanation is the correct one.
Intelligence could be measured by a single scalar—IQ.
correspondence theory is the correct theory of truth.
correspondence-truth is established by a combination of predictive accuracy and simplicity.
every AI has a utility function..
.. even if its utility function is in the eye if the beholder
modal realism is false..
.. but many worlds is true.
.. You shouldnt care about things that make no observable predictions..
.. unless it’s many worlds.
You are a piece of machinery with no free will...
...but its vitally important to exert yourself to steer the world to a future without AI apocalypse.
These ideas are definitely pointing in the direction of rationality realism. I think most of them are related to items on my list, although I’ve tried to phrase them in less ambiguous ways.