The problem with shares as a society-wide solution is that a lot of people will sell them and waste the money and you’re back where you’re started. If you’re banned from selling them, you don’t really own them and it’s just a roundabout form of welfare/UBI.
The problem with shares as a society-wide solution is that a lot of people will sell them and waste the money and you’re back where you’re started. If you’re banned from selling them, you don’t really own them and it’s just a roundabout form of welfare/UBI.
The latter claim feels like a very libertarian view of rights. People can’t sell their citizenship or their organs either.
How similar is ShardPhoenix’s view to the results of voucher privatization in Russia?
I don’t how a descriptive historical event should give evidence towards, never mind be similar to, a normative claim like rights.