There are countless physiological as well as psychological properties that form statistical family resemblance clusters for male and female. I already mentioned things-vs-people and interest in sex for male, but there are many others. Those clusters of properties are very unlikely to be significantly instantiated in the opposite sex, even if a few individual properties often deviate from the cluster. A “perfect” sex transition from male to female obviously wouldn’t be perfect if the resulting individual still had a male-typical bone structure, muscle structure, face shape, etc, and the same holds for psychological properties.
What does it even mean “psychology of the original sex”?
Seems to me like calling every male with height below 165cm of height trans, because he has below female average height.
There are countless physiological as well as psychological properties that form statistical family resemblance clusters for male and female. I already mentioned things-vs-people and interest in sex for male, but there are many others. Those clusters of properties are very unlikely to be significantly instantiated in the opposite sex, even if a few individual properties often deviate from the cluster. A “perfect” sex transition from male to female obviously wouldn’t be perfect if the resulting individual still had a male-typical bone structure, muscle structure, face shape, etc, and the same holds for psychological properties.