The Wikipedia articles “Gender” and “Gender identity”, as well as their external links, would be a good start—as well as my previous post on LW, “Gender Identity and Rationality”, and its discussion area.
As for religion, despite being an atheist myself, I’m not going to assume the hardline “atheism or bust” stance and instead I’ll politely decline to derail the thread.
The most important difference is that religion involves people making conclusions about nonexistent (from an atheist’s point of view) external entities, while gender identity involves people making conclusions about their own minds—and who can know your mind better than yourself?
people making conclusions about their own minds—and who can know your mind better than yourself?
Seductive, but false. Once my best friend and I disagreed about how I would react to a particular event. He was right. I would also say confidently that people online who claim to be vampires or stuff like that are, if they’re sincere, making a mistake. Also, I know things about the psychology of suicidal thoughts that enable me to know important facts about the minds of a certain class of suicidal people better than they do. Also, there are people who deceive themselves about, e.g., being bisexual.
Moreover, if nobody can know my mind better than I, this is a big problem. It means psychology hasn’t advanced enough. There’s a doctor right now who knows my spine much better than I ever will, and this is how it should be. We need external specialized experts.
And most important—this is completely useless when you’re trying to know your own mind. Some people regret transitioning and go back. When I worry about that, I can’t shrug and say “Oh, but I can’t be wrong!”.
Moreover, if nobody can know my mind better than I, this is a big problem. It means psychology hasn’t advanced enough.
Psychology hasn’t advanced enough. It’s been discussed here on LW over and over again. It is ultimately based on an inherent degree of subjectivity and something more akin to a collection of best practices than actual science.
And most important—this is completely useless when you’re trying to know your own mind. Some people regret transitioning and go back.
Transitioning is always a risk—the best that can be done is minimizing the likelihood of such an event by carefully evaluating the pros and cons beforehand.
And while it is a therapist making the final decision, it is ultimately based on self-diagnosis. If you don’t realize you have gender identity problems, nobody else will do it for you.
I wonder if the is-ought distinction can help us here. Which phrase better describes your feelings in the past: “desire to be female”, or “perception of being female”? If it’s the former, there’s nothing to argue about and I will happily strike the word “delusion” out of my mind, replacing it with “desire”, and everyone’s happy. If it’s the latter, what gives you confidence that your perception was correct in some sense, other than the perception itself?
It is desire, more or less—if someone believes they already have body parts they actually don’t, now that’s a delusion. However, calling it “desire” implicitly implies that fulfilling it is optional for their well-being, and that it’s somehow okay to treat them the way they don’t want to be treated until then.
The Wikipedia articles “Gender” and “Gender identity”, as well as their external links, would be a good start—as well as my previous post on LW, “Gender Identity and Rationality”, and its discussion area.
As for religion, despite being an atheist myself, I’m not going to assume the hardline “atheism or bust” stance and instead I’ll politely decline to derail the thread.
The most important difference is that religion involves people making conclusions about nonexistent (from an atheist’s point of view) external entities, while gender identity involves people making conclusions about their own minds—and who can know your mind better than yourself?
Seductive, but false. Once my best friend and I disagreed about how I would react to a particular event. He was right. I would also say confidently that people online who claim to be vampires or stuff like that are, if they’re sincere, making a mistake. Also, I know things about the psychology of suicidal thoughts that enable me to know important facts about the minds of a certain class of suicidal people better than they do. Also, there are people who deceive themselves about, e.g., being bisexual.
Moreover, if nobody can know my mind better than I, this is a big problem. It means psychology hasn’t advanced enough. There’s a doctor right now who knows my spine much better than I ever will, and this is how it should be. We need external specialized experts.
And most important—this is completely useless when you’re trying to know your own mind. Some people regret transitioning and go back. When I worry about that, I can’t shrug and say “Oh, but I can’t be wrong!”.
Psychology hasn’t advanced enough. It’s been discussed here on LW over and over again. It is ultimately based on an inherent degree of subjectivity and something more akin to a collection of best practices than actual science.
Transitioning is always a risk—the best that can be done is minimizing the likelihood of such an event by carefully evaluating the pros and cons beforehand.
And while it is a therapist making the final decision, it is ultimately based on self-diagnosis. If you don’t realize you have gender identity problems, nobody else will do it for you.
Yes. That’s why it’s really fucking important to figure out how to self-diagnose rather than say “Eh, people are whatever they say they are”.
I’d settle for improved heuristics.
If you can offer a rigorous, general procedure for that, I’m willing to listen.
I wonder if the is-ought distinction can help us here. Which phrase better describes your feelings in the past: “desire to be female”, or “perception of being female”? If it’s the former, there’s nothing to argue about and I will happily strike the word “delusion” out of my mind, replacing it with “desire”, and everyone’s happy. If it’s the latter, what gives you confidence that your perception was correct in some sense, other than the perception itself?
It is desire, more or less—if someone believes they already have body parts they actually don’t, now that’s a delusion. However, calling it “desire” implicitly implies that fulfilling it is optional for their well-being, and that it’s somehow okay to treat them the way they don’t want to be treated until then.