It seems to me that a lot of that is about CFAR problems that were also there before the episode of the camp. I do think that it’s reasonable to say that CFAR had some issues where knowing about those issues reduces faith in CFAR and the rationality community around it.
No actually. Ziz and I at least were following the advice of Youtube pot lawyers that she had shared with me amounting to “shut the fuck up” and “don’t sign anything”, limiting what we said to a few phrases like “am I being detained or free to go?” “why are you doing this?” and “I want a/my lawyer”.
“Many aspects of the strange incident on Friday in Occidental remain a mystery, a sheriff’s spokeswoman, Misti Wood, told The Chronicle. The suspects were allegedly uncooperative and spoke incoherently, and Wood said investigators had to rely on fingerprints to identify them.”
This suggest that you did not share your legal names with the police, and I think based legal advise does include sharing your legal names with the police when being arrested.
Did you follow requests like putting down the masks? What was the reasoning for the mask in particular? If I go to an invent with the hope of convincing people through conversation I would expect that wearing mask is counterproductive to my goal.
Not the biggest part of the ordeal, but yeah my account on LW was banned/deleted, and I was banned from CFAR/LW and SSC meetups, and was kicked out of a Facebook discussion group about the event and a Discord server.
The banned list for SSC meetups as of April 2020 was: Giego C, Brent D, Michael V, Robert L, Alice M, Z*, Alison S
I think Z* is probably Ziz, but I don’t think that any of those names refers to you. Also most meetup organizers were not aware of the existence of that list which lead to the episode of Michael being invited as the main speaker of the online SSC event.
“Moderator note: I’ve deleted six comments on this thread by users Ziz and Gwen_, who appear to be the primary people responsible for barricading off last month’s CFAR alumni reunion, and who were subsequently arrested on multiple charges, including false imprisonment.
I explicitly don’t want to judge the content of their allegations against CFAR, but both Ziz and Gwen_ have a sufficient track record of being aggressive offline (and Ziz also online) that I don’t really want them around on LessWrong or to provide a platform to them. So I’ve banned them for the next 3 months (until March 19th), during which I and the other moderators will come to a more long-term decision about what to do about all of this. ”
The one I took seriously, was later revealed to have been sent by Jamie Zajko
This is interesting in that the most serious violence against you came from Zajko. What was Zajko’s motivation here? Did he wanted to protect CFAR/MIRI? How did he came up living with Ziz, when he was that antagonistic against you?
This is interesting in that the most serious violence against you came from Zajko. What was Zajko’s motivation here? Did he wanted to protect CFAR/MIRI? How did he came up living with Ziz, when he was that antagonistic against you?
I believe, from memory, that Zajko identified herself as a woman in court, but I cannot access to the relevant Maryland local media rn bc it blocks European countries and the Internet Archive is down rn. For second-hand evidence e.g. here refers to Zajko as “a cis woman involved in the affair”.
It seems to me that a lot of that is about CFAR problems that were also there before the episode of the camp. I do think that it’s reasonable to say that CFAR had some issues where knowing about those issues reduces faith in CFAR and the rationality community around it.
The article in the sfchronicle said:
“Many aspects of the strange incident on Friday in Occidental remain a mystery, a sheriff’s spokeswoman, Misti Wood, told The Chronicle. The suspects were allegedly uncooperative and spoke incoherently, and Wood said investigators had to rely on fingerprints to identify them.”
This suggest that you did not share your legal names with the police, and I think based legal advise does include sharing your legal names with the police when being arrested.
Did you follow requests like putting down the masks? What was the reasoning for the mask in particular? If I go to an invent with the hope of convincing people through conversation I would expect that wearing mask is counterproductive to my goal.
The banned list for SSC meetups as of April 2020 was: Giego C, Brent D, Michael V, Robert L, Alice M, Z*, Alison S
I think Z* is probably Ziz, but I don’t think that any of those names refers to you. Also most meetup organizers were not aware of the existence of that list which lead to the episode of Michael being invited as the main speaker of the online SSC event.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/96N8BT9tJvybLbn5z/we-run-the-center-for-applied-rationality-ama?commentId=5W86zzFy48WiLcSg6 seems to be the moderator note for the temporary banning of you on LessWrong where habryka wrote:
“Moderator note: I’ve deleted six comments on this thread by users Ziz and Gwen_, who appear to be the primary people responsible for barricading off last month’s CFAR alumni reunion, and who were subsequently arrested on multiple charges, including false imprisonment.
I explicitly don’t want to judge the content of their allegations against CFAR, but both Ziz and Gwen_ have a sufficient track record of being aggressive offline (and Ziz also online) that I don’t really want them around on LessWrong or to provide a platform to them. So I’ve banned them for the next 3 months (until March 19th), during which I and the other moderators will come to a more long-term decision about what to do about all of this. ”
This is interesting in that the most serious violence against you came from Zajko. What was Zajko’s motivation here? Did he wanted to protect CFAR/MIRI? How did he came up living with Ziz, when he was that antagonistic against you?
Zajko is a cis woman FTR.
That claim seems to be contrary to mainstream media reporting that suggest they identify as nonbinary.
If you want to correct that record, based on what do you base your claim?
I believe, from memory, that Zajko identified herself as a woman in court, but I cannot access to the relevant Maryland local media rn bc it blocks European countries and the Internet Archive is down rn. For second-hand evidence e.g. here refers to Zajko as “a cis woman involved in the affair”.
Rather, Zajko is biologically female, as reflected in other reporting.
So she’s assigned female at birth but probably identified as nonbinary at least at some point.
(nonbinary might be the common phrasing, it’s compatible with the bigender label that Ziz herself uses)