I expect that micro-blogging will be an excellent combination with the arbital-style of voting on things. I especially think that you could get very good results from voting on per-post ‘related links’ submitted by users. Tumblr has reblogs for responding to things, but those naturally become mediated by viralness instead of internal coherence.
I can imagine a neural-activation-like effect coming out of that, where frequently co-active posts naturally rise to the top of each other’s links and become threads or topics.
I can imagine a neural-activation-like effect coming out of that, where frequently co-active posts naturally rise to the top of each other’s links and become threads or topics.
If a lot of people vote that two articles are linked, they become linked to each other. This will naturally form topic threading somewhere between between Wikipedia link diving and Tumblr reblogs.
I expect that micro-blogging will be an excellent combination with the arbital-style of voting on things. I especially think that you could get very good results from voting on per-post ‘related links’ submitted by users. Tumblr has reblogs for responding to things, but those naturally become mediated by viralness instead of internal coherence.
I can imagine a neural-activation-like effect coming out of that, where frequently co-active posts naturally rise to the top of each other’s links and become threads or topics.
Are you planning anything like that?
Not sure what you mean by this.
If a lot of people vote that two articles are linked, they become linked to each other. This will naturally form topic threading somewhere between between Wikipedia link diving and Tumblr reblogs.