I think I don’t (automatically) see the dots connected here of how the linked section translates into something I’d call “US-led entente” (I think I maybe get it based on vague recollections of Dario writings or something, but, would appreciate you spelling it out more)
See footnote 11. One-sentence version: US and allies enforce control on hardware, domestically and abroad, and there’s carrots for cooperating and large sticks for not cooperating. Beyond that, not worth getting into / it would take me a long time to articulate something helpful. But happy to chat live, e.g. call me tomorrow.
(I think the thing you’re calling US-led entente is something towards the latter end of the “Globally Controlled Takeof --> Ad hoc semi-controlled Takeoff” spectrum in this comment, does that sound right?)
I think I don’t (automatically) see the dots connected here of how the linked section translates into something I’d call “US-led entente” (I think I maybe get it based on vague recollections of Dario writings or something, but, would appreciate you spelling it out more)
See footnote 11. One-sentence version: US and allies enforce control on hardware, domestically and abroad, and there’s carrots for cooperating and large sticks for not cooperating. Beyond that, not worth getting into / it would take me a long time to articulate something helpful. But happy to chat live, e.g. call me tomorrow.
Nod, that’s clear enough for now.
(I think the thing you’re calling US-led entente is something towards the latter end of the “Globally Controlled Takeof --> Ad hoc semi-controlled Takeoff” spectrum in this comment, does that sound right?)
I don’t think so. I mean globally controlled takeoff where the US-led-coalition is in charge.