isn’t causality subjective, i.e., a function of background knowledge
This seems not in the least contentious, if you’re talking about the map of causality.
The question is whether causality exists in the territory at all.
Causality is a useful tool in the map, to describe the territory. The Territory just is. It doesn’t have causality, laws of physics or anything else. Those are just the best tools we have to form accurate maps of it.
The Territory just is. It doesn’t have causality, laws of physics or anything else.
How do you know that?
This seems not in the least contentious, if you’re talking about the map of causality.
The question is whether causality exists in the territory at all.
Causality is a useful tool in the map, to describe the territory. The Territory just is. It doesn’t have causality, laws of physics or anything else. Those are just the best tools we have to form accurate maps of it.
How do you know that?