OK, fair enough, I guess the value of this paper was making that assumption explicit. Halpern’s 1999 paper (Perplexed links) constructs such an example.
And is it in any way interesting? Does it allow you to do great inference beyond the ken of Bayesianism? Or is it just some annoying corner-case?
I haven’t spent time understanding the example, but Perplexed’s explanation of the need for infinite event space suggests it’s not very interesting.
OK, fair enough, I guess the value of this paper was making that assumption explicit. Halpern’s 1999 paper (Perplexed links) constructs such an example.
And is it in any way interesting? Does it allow you to do great inference beyond the ken of Bayesianism? Or is it just some annoying corner-case?
I haven’t spent time understanding the example, but Perplexed’s explanation of the need for infinite event space suggests it’s not very interesting.